Literature DB >> 28702693

[Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

F Steinkohl1, A Luger2, J Bektic3, F Aigner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. The diagnosis is normally achieved by a systematic prostate biopsy; however, this is a randomized approach by which a substantial number of significant carcinomas go undetected. For this reason, in recent years imaging techniques have been continuously developed, which enable visualization and therefore targeted biopsies. STANDARD PROCEDURE: The use of systematic biopsies is a standard procedure for the detection of prostate cancer. The quality of biopsies can be increased if the prostate is examined for the presence of suspected cancerous alterations during the biopsy. This can be carried out using multiparametric transrectral ultrasound. PERFORMANCE: Multiparametric ultrasound within the framework of a targeted biopsy increases the detection rate of significant prostate carcinomas with a simultaneous decrease in detection of insignificant carcinomas; however, the diagnostic reliability and the evidence level of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound are not yet sufficiently high to be able to replace a systematic biopsy.
CONCLUSION: In the hands of a well-trained examiner multiparametric transrectal ultrasound represents a good method for detection of prostate carcinomas. With the progression in technical developments of ultrasound technology, the detection rate will presumably be further increased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection rate; Diagnostic reliability; Evidence level; Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28702693     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-017-0274-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  18 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Edouard J Trabulsi; Daniel Sackett; Leonard G Gomella; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) Imaging: Terminology Describing the Many Aspects of Ultrasonography.

Authors:  P S Sidhu
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real-time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10-core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Nils Drews; Philippe Autier; Ann Beckmann; Hans Heinzer; Jens Hansen; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Alex Haese; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Andreas Becker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Status of transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Michael Mitterberger; Peter Rehder; Leo Pallwein; Daniel Junker; Wolfgang Horninger; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Ege Can Serefoglu; Serkan Altinova; Nevzat Serdar Ugras; Egemen Akincioglu; Erem Asil; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Maxeiner; Carsten Stephan; Tahir Durmus; Torsten Slowinski; Hannes Cash; Thomas Fischer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Thilo Eggert; Rein Jüri Palisaar; Florian Roghmann; Katharina Braun; Björn Löppenberg; Florian Sommerer; Joachim Noldus; Christian von Bodman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.

Authors:  Nienke L Hansen; Claudia Kesch; Tristan Barrett; Brendan Koo; Jan P Radtke; David Bonekamp; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Anne Y Warren; Kathrin Wieczorek; Markus Hohenfellner; Christof Kastner; Boris Hadaschik
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies.

Authors:  Osamu Ukimura; Arnaud Marien; Suzanne Palmer; Arnauld Villers; Manju Aron; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Scott Leslie; Sunao Shoji; Toru Matsugasumi; Mitchell Gross; Prokar Dasgupta; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alexandre Peltier; Fouad Aoun; Fouad El-Khoury; Eric Hawaux; Ksenija Limani; Krishna Narahari; Nicolas Sirtaine; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.