Literature DB >> 26415734

Comparison of meta-analyses among elastosonography (ES) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging techniques in the application of prostate cancer diagnosis.

Qiaohong Ouyang1, Zhongxiang Duan2, Jixiao Lei2, Guangli Jiao2.   

Abstract

The early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) appears to be of vital significance for the provision of appropriate treatment programs. Even though several sophisticated imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and elastosonography (ES) have already been developed for PCa diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging techniques is still controversial to some extent. Therefore, a comprehensive meta-analysis in this study was performed to compare the accuracy of various diagnostic imaging methods for PCa, including 11C-choline PET/CT, 11C-acetate PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-fluoroglucose PET/CT, transrectal real-time elastosonography (TRTE), and shear-wave elastosonography (SWE). The eligible studies were identified through systematical searching for the literature in electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science. On the basis of the fixed-effects model, the pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline PET/CT, 11C-acetate PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT, 18F-fluoroglucose (FDG) PET/CT, TRTE, and SWE. All the statistical analyses were conducted with R language Software. The present meta-analysis incorporating a total of 82 studies demonstrated that the pooled sensitivity of the six imaging techniques were sorted as follows: SWE > 18F-FCH PET/CT > 11C-choline PET/CT > TRTE > 11C-acetate PET/CT > 18F-FDG PET/CT; the pooled specificity were also compared: SWE > 18F-FCH PET/CT > 11C-choline PET/CT > TRTE > 18F-FDG PET/CT > 11C-acetate PET/CT; finally, the pooled diagnostic accuracy of the six imaging techniques based on AUC were ranked as below: SWE > 18F-FCH PET/CT > 11C-choline PET/CT > TRTE > 11C-acetate PET/CT > 18F-FDG PET/CT. SWE and 18F-FCH PET/CT imaging could offer more assistance in the early diagnosis of PCa than any other studied imaging techniques. However, the diagnostic ranking of the six imaging techniques might not be applicable to the clinical phase due to the shortage of stratified analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  11C-acetate PET/CT; 11C-choline PET/CT; 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT; 18F-fluoroglucose PET/CT; Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity; Prostate cancer; Shear-wave elastosonography; Transrectal real-time tissue elastosonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26415734     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4113-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  106 in total

1.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Masato Shiiba; Keiichi Ishihara; Go Kimura; Tomoyuki Kuwako; Hisashi Yoshihara; Naohisa Yoshihara; Hidetaka Sato; Yukihiro Kondo; Shin-ichi Tsuchiya; Shin-ichiro Kumita
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  A positive real-time elastography is an independent marker for detection of high-risk prostate cancers in the primary biopsy setting.

Authors:  Yngve Nygård; Svein A Haukaas; Ole J Halvorsen; Karsten Gravdal; Jannicke Frugård; Lars A Akslen; Christian Beisland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Tom Budiharto; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Laura Van den Bergh; Felix Mottaghy; Christophe M Deroose; Raymond Oyen; Filip Ameye; Kris Bogaerts; Karin Haustermans; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prospective comparison of computed tomography, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Matthias M Heck; Michael Souvatzoglou; Margitta Retz; Roman Nawroth; Hubert Kübler; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Bettina M Gramer; Gregor Weirich; Ina-Christine Rondak; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend; Bernd Krause; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images.

Authors:  Tomoaki Miyagawa; Masakazu Tsutsumi; Takeshi Matsumura; Natsui Kawazoe; Satoru Ishikawa; Tatsuro Shimokama; Naoto Miyanaga; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The use of F-18 choline PET in the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer: correlation with morphological changes on CT.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Josef Hammer; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Ignac Fogelman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Peter Struve; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Georg Bartsch; Johann Gradl; Matthias Schurich; Florian Pedross; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Impact of Real-Time Elastography versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy Method on Cancer Detection Rate in Men with a Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Paola Magnoni; Guido Giusti; Mauro Seveso; Alessio Benetti; Rodolfo Hurle; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Francesco Minuti; Fabio Grizzi; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Mechanisms Related with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer-Is It Just a Matter of Numbers?

Authors:  Cristian Surcel; Alexander Kretschmer; Cristian Mirvald; Ioanel Sinescu; Isabel Heidegger; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.