Literature DB >> 26040249

Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Wendy J Cannan1, David S Pederson1.   

Abstract

All organisms suffer double-strand breaks (DSBs) in their DNA as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs can also form when replication forks encounter DNA lesions or repair intermediates. The processing and repair of DSBs can lead to mutations, loss of heterozygosity, and chromosome rearrangements that result in cell death or cancer. The most common pathway used to repair DSBs in metazoans (non-homologous DNA end joining) is more commonly mutagenic than the alternative pathway (homologous recombination mediated repair). Thus, factors that influence the choice of pathways used DSB repair can affect an individual's mutation burden and risk of cancer. This review describes radiological, chemical, and biological mechanisms that generate DSBs, and discusses the impact of such variables as DSB etiology, cell type, cell cycle, and chromatin structure on the yield, distribution, and processing of DSBs. The final section focuses on nucleosome-specific mechanisms that influence DSB production, and the possible relationship between higher order chromosome coiling and chromosome shattering (chromothripsis).
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26040249      PMCID: PMC4994891          DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  145 in total

1.  Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit.

Authors:  P Oudet; M Gross-Bellard; P Chambon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Sheila S David; Valerie L O'Shea; Sucharita Kundu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Base excision repair.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Magnar Bjørås
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful.

Authors:  Mohan Doss; Mark P Little; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Nucleosomes suppress the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during attempted base excision repair of clustered oxidative damages.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; Betty P Tsang; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Higher order coiling of DNA in chromatin.

Authors:  A Worcel; C Benyajati
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks.

Authors:  Anna Malkova; James E Haber
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The homologous recombination machinery modulates the formation of RNA-DNA hybrids and associated chromosome instability.

Authors:  Lamia Wahba; Steven K Gore; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  95 in total

1.  Effects of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus Strain INMIA 9602 Er 317/402 and Putative Probiotic Lactobacilli on DNA Damages in the Small Intestine of Wistar Rats In Vivo.

Authors:  Astghik Z Pepoyan; Marine H Balayan; Lilit Malkhasyan; Anahit Manvelyan; Tatevik Bezhanyan; Ruzanna Paronikyan; Vardan V Tsaturyan; Stepan Tatikyan; Shigeru Kamiya; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Nucleosomes effectively shield DNA from radiation damage in living cells.

Authors:  Francesca Brambilla; Jose Manuel Garcia-Manteiga; Emanuele Monteleone; Lena Hoelzen; Angelica Zocchi; Alessandra Agresti; Marco E Bianchi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  RNase H eliminates R-loops that disrupt DNA replication but is nonessential for efficient DSB repair.

Authors:  Hongchang Zhao; Min Zhu; Oliver Limbo; Paul Russell
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Stitching up broken DNA ends by FANCA.

Authors:  Anna Palovcak; Wenjun Liu; Fenghua Yuan; Yanbin Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2018-09-25

5.  A DNA nick at Ku-blocked double-strand break ends serves as an entry site for exonuclease 1 (Exo1) or Sgs1-Dna2 in long-range DNA end resection.

Authors:  Weibin Wang; James M Daley; Youngho Kwon; Xiaoyu Xue; Danielle S Krasner; Adam S Miller; Kevin A Nguyen; Elizabeth A Williamson; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Robert Hromas; Patrick Sung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  DNA double-strand breaks: a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nidheesh Thadathil; Roderick Hori; Jianfeng Xiao; Mohammad Moshahid Khan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Synthetic Lethality through the Lens of Medicinal Chemistry.

Authors:  Samuel H Myers; Jose Antonio Ortega; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Progressing from Recurring Tissue Injury to Genomic Instability: A New Mechanism of Neutrophil Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Triet M Bui; Ronen Sumagin
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  A reporter mouse for in vivo detection of DNA damage in embryonic germ cells.

Authors:  Jordana C Bloom; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  High-resolution, ultrasensitive and quantitative DNA double-strand break labeling in eukaryotic cells using i-BLESS.

Authors:  Anna Biernacka; Magdalena Skrzypczak; Yingjie Zhu; Philippe Pasero; Maga Rowicka; Krzysztof Ginalski
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.