Literature DB >> 26273056

DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.

Ryan Mayle1, Ian M Campbell1, Christine R Beck1, Yang Yu1, Marenda Wilson1, Chad A Shaw1, Lotte Bjergbaek2, James R Lupski3, Grzegorz Ira4.   

Abstract

Most spontaneous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) result from replication-fork breakage. Break-induced replication (BIR), a genome rearrangement-prone repair mechanism that requires the Pol32/POLD3 subunit of eukaryotic DNA Polδ, was proposed to repair broken forks, but how genome destabilization is avoided was unknown. We show that broken fork repair initially uses error-prone Pol32-dependent synthesis, but that mutagenic synthesis is limited to within a few kilobases from the break by Mus81 endonuclease and a converging fork. Mus81 suppresses template switches between both homologous sequences and diverged human Alu repetitive elements, highlighting its importance for stability of highly repetitive genomes. We propose that lack of a timely converging fork or Mus81 may propel genome instability observed in cancer.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273056      PMCID: PMC4782627          DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  28 in total

1.  Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast.

Authors:  Chu Kwen Ho; Gerard Mazón; Alicia F Lam; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32.

Authors:  John R Lydeard; Suvi Jain; Miyuki Yamaguchi; James E Haber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Template switching during break-induced replication.

Authors:  Catherine E Smith; Bertrand Llorente; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; John Lydeard; Moreshwar Vaze; Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks.

Authors:  Laura Roseaulin; Yoshiki Yamada; Yasuhiro Tsutsui; Paul Russell; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Benoit Arcangioli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation.

Authors:  Ylli Doksani; Rodrigo Bermejo; Simona Fiorani; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A Flp-nick system to study repair of a single protein-bound nick in vivo.

Authors:  Ida Nielsen; Iben Bach Bentsen; Michael Lisby; Sabine Hansen; Kamilla Mundbjerg; Anni H Andersen; Lotte Bjergbaek
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Functional overlap between the structure-specific nucleases Yen1 and Mus81-Mms4 for DNA-damage repair in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Miguel G Blanco; Joao Matos; Ulrich Rass; Stephen C Y Ip; Stephen C West
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-27

9.  Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate.

Authors:  Angela Deem; Andrea Keszthelyi; Tiffany Blackgrove; Alexandra Vayl; Barbara Coffey; Ruchi Mathur; Andrei Chabes; Anna Malkova
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mus81-Mms4 is a catalytic, DNA structure-selective endonuclease.

Authors:  Kirk Tevebaugh Ehmsen; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  95 in total

Review 1.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  2018 Victor A. McKusick Leadership Award: Molecular Mechanisms for Genomic and Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Rad5 dysregulation drives hyperactive recombination at replication forks resulting in cisplatin sensitivity and genome instability.

Authors:  Eric E Bryant; Ivana Šunjevarić; Luke Berchowitz; Rodney Rothstein; Robert J D Reid
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Break-induced replication: an unhealthy choice for stress relief?

Authors:  Juraj Kramara; Beth Osia; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Mre11 complex links sister chromatids to promote repair of a collapsed replication fork.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Hongchang Zhao; Oliver Limbo; Paul Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway is facilitated by the Irc5 translocase through cohesin.

Authors:  Ireneusz Litwin; Tomasz Bakowski; Barnabas Szakal; Ewa Pilarczyk; Ewa Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska; Dana Branzei; Robert Wysocki
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Break induced replication in eukaryotes: mechanisms, functions, and consequences.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sakofsky; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 9.  Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.626

10.  Homolog-Dependent Repair Following Dicentric Chromosome Breakage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jayaram Bhandari; Travis Karg; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.