Literature DB >> 23143074

Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.

M A Momin1, K Matsumoto, K Ejima, R Asaumi, T Kawai, Y Arai, K Honda, T Yosue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the width and morphology of the mandible in the impacted third molar region, and to identify the location of the mandibular canal prior to planning impacted third molar operations.
METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 87 mandibular third molars from 62 Japanese patients were analyzed in this study. The width of the lingual cortical bone and apex-canal distance were measured from cross-sectional images in which the cortical bone was thinnest at the lingual side in the third molar region. Images were used for measuring the space (distance between the inner border of the lingual cortical bone and outer surface of the third molar root), apex-canal distance (distance from the root of the third molar tooth to the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal) and the cortical bone (width between the inner and outer borders of the lingual cortical bone).
RESULTS: The means of the space, apex-canal distance and lingual cortical width were 0.31, 1.99, and 0.68 mm, respectively. Impacted third molar teeth (types A-C) were observed at the following frequencies: type A (angular) 37 %; type B (horizontal), 42 %; type C (vertical), 21 %. The morphology of the mandible at the third molar region (types D-F) was observed as: type D (round), 49 %; type E (lingual extended), 18 %; and type F (lingual concave), 32 %.
CONCLUSIONS: The width and morphology of the mandible with impacted teeth and the location of the mandibular canal at the third molar region could be clearly determined using cross-sectional CBCT images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143074     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1031-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  35 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: "low-dose cone-beam" CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations.

Authors:  Mauro Rigolone; Damiano Pasqualini; Lorenzo Bianchi; Elio Berutti; Silvio Diego Bianchi
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction.

Authors:  Michael Sedaghatfar; Meredith A August; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  K Honda; Y Arai; M Kashima; Y Takano; K Sawada; K Ejima; K Iwai
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Weeraya Tantanapornkul; Kiyoshi Okouchi; Yoshikuni Fujiwara; Masashi Yamashiro; Yutaka Maruoka; Naoto Ohbayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-09-01

6.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography.

Authors:  Oana Bida Honey; William Charles Scarfe; Michael J Hilgers; Kathleen Klueber; Anibal M Silveira; Bruce S Haskell; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars.

Authors:  Anni Suomalainen; Irja Ventä; Mika Mattila; Lauri Turtola; Tapio Vehmas; Jaakko S Peltola
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-02

8.  Clinical consequences of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar.

Authors:  A V van Gool; J J Ten Bosch; G Boering
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1977-02

9.  Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.

Authors:  H Ghaeminia; G J Meijer; A Soehardi; W A Borstlap; J Mulder; S J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases.

Authors:  Søren Hillerup
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.606

View more
  13 in total

1.  Risk factors for lingual plate fracture during mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  Cheng Huang; Chun Zhou; Minhua Xu; Derong Zou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Quantitative pixel grey measurement of the "high-risk" sign, darkening of third molar roots: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Szalma; Z Bata; E Lempel; S Jeges; L Olasz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.

Authors:  Selda Yildiz; Gurkan Rasit Bayar; Inanc Guvenc; Necdet Kocabiyik; Ayhan Cömert; Fatih Yazar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Cone-beam computed tomography and microtomography for alveolar bone measurements.

Authors:  Nathália Ferrare; André Ferreira Leite; Hugo César Pinto Marques Caracas; Ricardo Bentes de Azevedo; Nilce Santos de Melo; Paulo Tadeu de Souza Figueiredo
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Ilkay Peker; Cigdem Sarikir; Meryem Toraman Alkurt; Zeynep Fatma Zor
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Variations in the buccal-lingual alveolar bone thickness of impacted mandibular third molar: our classification and treatment perspectives.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Jia-Wei Zheng; Chi Yang; Wen-Tao Qian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT.

Authors:  Dongmiao Wang; Xiaotong He; Yanling Wang; Guangchao Zhou; Chao Sun; Lianfeng Yang; Jianling Bai; Jun Gao; Yunong Wu; Jie Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mesiolingual root rotation for horizontal mandibular third molar extraction: position classification and surgical simulation.

Authors:  Zhou-Xi Ye; Chi Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Analyses of anatomical relationship between mandibular third molar roots and variations in lingual undercut of mandible using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sertac Aktop; Onur Atalı; Oguz Borahan; Gokhan Gocmen; Hasan Garip
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.080

10.  Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dong-Soo Kim; Oyuntugs Rashsuren; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.