Literature DB >> 402320

Clinical consequences of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar.

A V van Gool, J J Ten Bosch, G Boering.   

Abstract

Quantitative data on postoperative complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar, especially in relation to the different methods of treatment, are scarce. Mostly an objective approach is lacking. The present study attempts to provide such data and their clinical consequences. Within 1 year, 932 mandibular third molars were removed; 430 extractions served as a control group for 502 surgical removals. The procedure was fully standardized and all measurements objectively obtained. A computer was used for statistical evaluation. It appeared from this study that the possibility of postoperative complaints and complications will be smaller if the wound is not packed, if tight suturing is not done and if reflection of the mucoperiosteum is avoided. If reflection is inevitable the oblique vertical relaxing incision is preferred. Prophylactic administration of antibiotics is rejected.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 402320     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(77)80069-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Surg        ISSN: 0300-9785


  21 in total

1.  To compare standard incision and comma shaped incision and its influence on post-operative complications in surgical removal of impacted third molars.

Authors:  Saravana Kumar B; Sarumathi T; Veerabahu M; Uma Raman
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-07-01

Review 2.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparing the Efficiencies of Third Molar Surgeries With and Without a Dentist Anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Uday Reebye; S Young; E Boukas; E Davidian; J Carnahan
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2017

4.  Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.

Authors:  M A Momin; K Matsumoto; K Ejima; R Asaumi; T Kawai; Y Arai; K Honda; T Yosue
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Pharmacokinetics of parenteral paracetamol and its analgesic effects in post-operative dental pain.

Authors:  R A Seymour; M D Rawlins
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain.

Authors:  R A Seymour
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Impact of third molar removal on demands for postoperative care and job disruption: does anaesthetic choice make a difference?

Authors:  D J Edwards; J Horton; J P Shepherd; M R Brickley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Comparing the Efficiency of Two Different Extraction Techniques in Removal of Maxillary Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joseph Edward; Mubarak A Aziz; Arjun Madhu Usha; Jyothi K Narayanan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  The effect of modified surgical flap design for removal of lower third molars on lingual nerve injury.

Authors:  Anwar B Bataineh; Ra'ad A Batarseh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Drug-induced taste and smell disorders. Incidence, mechanisms and management related primarily to treatment of sensory receptor dysfunction.

Authors:  R I Henkin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.