Literature DB >> 17234544

A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Weeraya Tantanapornkul1, Kiyoshi Okouchi, Yoshikuni Fujiwara, Masashi Yamashiro, Yutaka Maruoka, Naoto Ohbayashi, Tohru Kurabayashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with panoramic images in predicting neurovascular bundle exposure during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. STUDY
DESIGN: Cone-beam CT and panoramic images of 142 impacted mandibular third molars were prospectively evaluated to assess tooth relationship to the mandibular canal. These interpretations were then correlated with intraoperative findings. The sensitivity and specificity of the 2 modalities in predicting neurovascular bundle exposure at extraction were calculated and compared. The diagnostic criterion for panoramic images was defined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: In predicting the exposure, the sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 77% for cone-beam CT, and 70% and 63% for panoramic images, respectively. Cone-beam CT was significantly superior to panoramic images in both sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSION: Cone-beam CT was significantly superior to panoramic images in predicting neurovascular bundle exposure during extraction of impacted mandibular third molar teeth.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17234544     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  63 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.

Authors:  Paul W Poeschl; Nina Schmidt; Godoberto Guevara-Rojas; Rudolf Seemann; Rolf Ewers; Harald T Zipko; Kurt Schicho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Mah; T E Reeves; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method.

Authors:  H Watanabe; E Honda; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Ability of two radiographic methods to identify the closeness between the mandibular third molar root and the inferior alveolar canal: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Kositbowornchai; W Densiri-aksorn; P Piumthanaroj
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports.

Authors:  Andrea Tuzi; Roberto Di Bari; Andrea Cicconetti
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-14

10.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.