Literature DB >> 23135930

Three-way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and spectra MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in nasal surveillance cultures.

Gerald A Denys1, Pamela B Renzi, Kim M Koch, Carol M Wissel.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of hospital-acquired and life-threatening infections. Active surveillance programs for MRSA utilize either molecular or culture-based methods. A prospective study was performed to compare the performance of selective and differential chromogenic media, BBL CHROMagar MRSA II (CMRSA II; BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA), and Spectra MRSA (Remel, Lenexa, KS), for the detection of MRSA in nasal swab specimens. A total of 515 compliant remnant nasal swab specimens were sequentially used to inoculate BBL Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (TSA II) and each chromogenic medium. After 24 h of incubation, colony color reactions and morphology on chromogenic media were compared to suspicious colonies on nonselective TSA II. MRSA on TSA II was confirmed by Gram staining, a coagulase test, and a cefoxitin disk test. The overall prevalence of MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) on TSA II was 12.4% (64/515) and 9.7% (50/515), respectively. When each chromogenic medium was compared to the standard culture method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: CMRSA II, 87.7% and 98.6%; MRSASelect, 89.0% and 93.4%; and Spectra MRSA, 83.6% and 92.1%. The positive predictive values were highest for CMRSA II (91.4%), followed by MRSASelect (69.1%) and Spectra MRSA (63.5%). False-positive results on chromogenic media were mainly due to color interpretation. The negative predictive values for all three media were greater than 97%. In conclusion, CMRSA II gave the best overall results for detecting MRSA from nasal specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23135930      PMCID: PMC3536262          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02022-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Combined use of Pastorex Staph-Plus and either of two new chromogenic agars, MRSA ID and CHROMagar MRSA, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Veerle Compernolle; Gerda Verschraegen; Geert Claeys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation.

Authors:  Julie Carson; Betty Lui; Linda Rosmus; Howard Rennick; Jeff Fuller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Methods for screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage.

Authors:  G L French
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Performance of a new chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA II (BD), for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in screening samples.

Authors:  Kristien Van Vaerenbergh; Reinoud Cartuyvels; Guy Coppens; Johan Frans; Anne-Marie Van den Abeele; Hans De Beenhouwer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.

Authors:  C Wendt; N L Havill; K C Chapin; J M Boyce; R Dickenson; U Eigner; S Schütt; A M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  James W Snyder; Gina K Munier; Charles L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Spectra MRSA, a new chromogenic agar medium to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jess F Peterson; Katherine M Riebe; Gerri S Hall; Deborah Wilson; Susan Whittier; Elizabeth Palavecino; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from an at-risk community population.

Authors:  Jason E Farley; Paul D Stamper; Tracy Ross; Mian Cai; Sharon Speser; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Volker Micheel; Benedikt Hogan; Thomas Köller; Philipp Warnke; Sabine Crusius; Rebecca Hinz; Ralf Matthias Hagen; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Hagen Frickmann
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2015-07-21

4.  Comparative assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus diagnostic assays for use in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  A Ayebare; L M Bebell; J Bazira; S Ttendo; V Katawera; D R Bangsberg; M J Siedner; P G Firth; Y Boum Ii
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.465

5.  Evaluation of a modified Cefsulodin-Irgasan-Novobiocin agar for isolation of Yersinia spp.

Authors:  Lai Kuan Tan; Peck Toung Ooi; Elisabeth Carniel; Kwai Lin Thong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multicenter Evaluation of MRSASelect II Chromogenic Agar for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Wound and Nasal Specimens.

Authors:  Diana R Hernandez; Duane W Newton; Nathan A Ledeboer; Blake Buchan; Carol Young; Andrew E Clark; Jessica Connoly; Donna M Wolk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.