Literature DB >> 17093032

Combined use of Pastorex Staph-Plus and either of two new chromogenic agars, MRSA ID and CHROMagar MRSA, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Veerle Compernolle1, Gerda Verschraegen, Geert Claeys.   

Abstract

We describe the search toward a fast and reliable strategy to detect and confirm the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in screening samples. First, we evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of oxacillin resistance screening agar (ORSA) with enrichment (tryptic soy broth [TSB] and ORSA [TSB-ORSA]) and without enrichment (ORSA), MRSA ID (MRSA_ID) plates, and CHROMagar MRSA (C_MRSA) plates, all of which were inoculated with equal volumes of a suspension made by emulsifying screening swabs. Whereas the sensitivities after 48 h were similar for all media tested (77% for MRSA_ID and ORSA; 73% for C_MRSA and ORSA after enrichment [TSB-ORSA]), the specificities of MRSA_ID (98% after 24 h and 94% after 48 h) and C_MRSA (98% after 24 h and 90% after 48 h) were superior to the specificities of ORSAs (92% after 24 h and 83% after 48 h) and TSB-ORSA (86% after 24 h and 81% after 48 h). Subsequently, the performance of the Pastorex Staph-Plus agglutination test with presumptive MRSA isolates taken directly from chromogenic agars (direct_Pastorex agglutination) was compared to that of the Pastorex Staph-Plus agglutination test with isolates from blood agar subcultures (conventional_Pastorex agglutination). When the direct_Pastorex agglutination test on MRSA_ID plates was combined with Gram staining, the direct_Pastorex agglutination test with samples from MRSA_ID plates was as reliable as the conventional_Pastorex agglutination test with samples from blood agar subcultures from MRSA_ID plates. In contrast, the direct_Pastorex agglutination test with samples from C_MRSA plates gave false-negative results. Finally, we calculated the processing times of the four different strategies, namely, (i) enrichment in TSB supplemented with NaCl, subsequent culture on ORSA, and the conventional_Pastorex agglutination test; (ii) direct inoculation of ORSA combined with conventional_Pastorex agglutination test; (iii) direct inoculation of MRSA_ID plates combined with Gram staining and the direct_Pastorex agglutination test; and (iv) direct inoculation of C_MRSA plates combined with Gram staining and the direct_Pastorex agglutination test. We concluded that the use of MRSA_ID in combination with Gram staining and the direct_Pastorex agglutination test is faster and more specific than the other strategies tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093032      PMCID: PMC1828984          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01115-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  M P JEVONS; A W COE; M T PARKER
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1963-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat.

Authors:  Nicola Zetola; John S Francis; Eric L Nuermberger; William R Bishai
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Evaluation of two new chromogenic media, CHROMagar MRSA and S. aureus ID, for identifying Staphylococcus aureus and screening methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Authors:  Göran Hedin; Hong Fang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Performance of a new chromogenic oxacillin resistance screen medium (Oxoid) in the detection and presumptive identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Petra Apfalter; Ojan Assadian; Andrea Kalczyk; Verena Lindenmann; Athanasios Makristathis; Stefan Mustafa; Manfred Rotter; Alexander M Hirschl
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Development and evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  John D Perry; Amie Davies; Lynne A Butterworth; Andrew L J Hopley; Audrey Nicholson; F Kate Gould
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Enzymatic profile of Pseudomonas maltophilia.

Authors:  M O'Brien; G H Davis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a novel medium for screening specimens from hospitalized patients to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D S Blanc; A Wenger; J Bille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of flocked and rayon swabs for detection of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among pathology staff members.

Authors:  Sabine De Silva; Gillian Wood; Tricia Quek; Christine Parrott; Catherine M Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of different chromogenic media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in broilers.

Authors:  L J Pletinckx; J Dewulf; Y De Bleecker; G Rasschaert; B M Goddeeris; I De Man
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.

Authors:  C Wendt; N L Havill; K C Chapin; J M Boyce; R Dickenson; U Eigner; S Schütt; A M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the impact of direct plating, broth enrichment, and specimen source on recovery and diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates among HIV-infected outpatients.

Authors:  S K McAllister; V S Albrecht; G E Fosheim; H K Lowery; P J Peters; R Gorwitz; J L Guest; J Hageman; R Mindley; L K McDougal; D Rimland; B Limbago
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Three-way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and spectra MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in nasal surveillance cultures.

Authors:  Gerald A Denys; Pamela B Renzi; Kim M Koch; Carol M Wissel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Screening, isolation, and decolonisation strategies in the control of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units: cost effectiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Julie V Robotham; Nicholas Graves; Barry D Cookson; Adrian G Barnett; Jennie A Wilson; Jonathan D Edgeworth; Rahul Batra; Brian H Cuthbertson; Ben S Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.