Literature DB >> 18032616

Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

John M Boyce1, Nancy L Havill.   

Abstract

We compared the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) real-time PCR assay with the CHROMagar MRSA assay for the detection of MRSA in 286 nasal surveillance specimens. Compared with the CHROMagar MRSA assay, PCR had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 100%, 98.6%, 95.8%, and 100%, respectively. The mean PCR turnaround time was 14.5 h.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 18032616      PMCID： PMC2224301          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.02130-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of CHROMagar MRSA medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bram Diederen; Inge van Duijn; Alex van Belkum; Piet Willemse; Peter van Keulen; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M W D Wren; Caroline Carder; P G Coen; V Gant; A P R Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  [Detection of nasal colonization methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing real-time genic amplification assay vs selective chromogenic media].

Authors:  J-C Nguyen Van; M-D Kitzis; A Ly; A Chalfine; J Carlet; A Ben Ali; F Goldstein
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2006-03-10

6.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.

Authors:  Diane Flayhart; Janet F Hindler; David A Bruckner; Geraldine Hall; Rabin K Shrestha; Sherilynn A Vogel; Sandra S Richter; Wanita Howard; Rhonda Walther; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Prospective comparison of a new chromogenic medium, MRSASelect, to CHROMagar MRSA and mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin or cefoxitin for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Luba Stoakes; Romina Reyes; Janis Daniel; Gwen Lennox; Michael A John; Robert Lannigan; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from nasal and rectal specimens pooled in a selective broth.

Authors:  M Desjardins; Christiane Guibord; B Lalonde; B Toye; K Ramotar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948
View more
  28 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal samples by multiplex real-time PCR based on dual priming AT-rich primers.

Authors:  M K Yadav; S K Kwon; H J Huh; S-W Chae; J-J Song
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in stool specimens.

Authors:  Nancy L Havill; John M Boyce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs.

Authors:  Larry J Bischof; Linda Lapsley; Karen Fontecchio; Dollie Jacosalem; Carol Young; Rosemary Hankerd; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cost-effective frozen master mix modification of a commercial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus PCR assay.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Timothy Block; Janet T Voegeli; Jeanne E Hryciuk; Ronald F Schell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  MVPlex assay for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in naris and other swab specimens.

Authors:  Raymond P Podzorski; Haijing Li; Jian Han; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  The pros, cons, and unknowns of search and destroy for carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Prashini Moodley; Andrew Whitelaw
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.