Literature DB >> 19951329

Methods for screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage.

G L French1.   

Abstract

Screening patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage at hospital admission is widely accepted as an essential part of MRSA control programmes. It is assumed, although not proven, that rapid reporting of screening results will improve MRSA control, provided that a clear action plan for positive cases is in place and is being followed. An effective culture screening method is direct inoculation of pooled nose, throat and perineal swabs on a well-performing MRSA-selective chromogenic agar; presumptive MRSA colonies can be confirmed rapidly by latex agglutination with antibodies directed against penicillin-binding protein 2a. This method will usually produce a positive result after 24 h of incubation in >95% of true-positive cases, and will be sufficient for most initial treatment and infection control decisions; full antimicrobial susceptibilities will be available on the next day. Inoculation of selective enrichment broth containing a colorimetric growth indicator is an alternative overnight culture method, but there may be problems with overgrowth of other organisms, such as enterococci. PCR methods are now available that can produce same-day results, provided that samples reach the laboratory in time for batch processing, but cultures are required for susceptibility testing. In comparison with culture-based methods, PCR tests are costly, and some have relatively high false-positivity rates; definitive evidence of their clinical cost-effectiveness is lacking. New point-of-care PCR tests are being introduced that are potentially even more rapid but are even more expensive; studies on the clinical cost-effectiveness of these very rapid tests are awaited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19951329     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03092.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  21 in total

1.  A selected screening programme was less effective in the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in an orthopaedic unit.

Authors:  Jayshree Dave; Paul J Jenkins; Alison Hardie; Melvyn Smith; Paul Gaston; Alan P Gibb; Kate Templeton; Alastair H Simpson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Meta-analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of infection in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ioannis M Zacharioudakis; Fainareti N Zervou; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Contribution of interfacility patient movement to overall methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence levels.

Authors:  Sean L Barnes; Anthony D Harris; Bruce L Golden; Edward A Wasil; Jon P Furuno
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Ward-specific rates of nasal cocolonization with methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus spp. and potential impact on molecular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening tests.

Authors:  Sophie Trouillet-Assant; Jean-Philippe Rasigade; Sebastien Lustig; Yannick Lhoste; Florent Valour; Claude Guerin; Frederic Aubrun; Sylvestre Tigaud; Frederic Laurent
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Harboring mecC Still Eludes Us in East London, United Kingdom.

Authors:  H Ciesielczuk; M Xenophontos; J Lambourne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Integrated Multilevel Surveillance of the World's Infecting Microbes and Their Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Thomas F O'Brien; John Stelling
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.

Authors:  Melanie L Yarbrough; David K Warren; Karen Allen; Dennis Burkholder; Robert Daum; Curtis Donskey; Dennis Knaack; Anthony LaMarca; Larissa May; Loren G Miller; David M Parenti; Lance Peterson; Thean Yen Tan; Raymond Widen; Diana R Hernandez; Donna M Wolk; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR Testing Reduces the Duration of MRSA-Targeted Therapy in Patients with Suspected MRSA Pneumonia.

Authors:  Nidhu Baby; Andrew C Faust; Terri Smith; Lyndsay A Sheperd; Laura Knoll; Edward L Goodman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  A Simple Way to Eradicate Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Tae M Kim; Hyojun Park; Kyo W Lee; Eun W Choi; Sang H Moon; Yong S Lee; Kahee Cho; Wan J Park; Jae B Park; Sung J Kim
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.982

10.  Screening of Staphylococcus aureus nasal strains isolated from medical students for toxin genes.

Authors:  L Piechowicz; K Garbacz; K Wiśniewska; M Dąbrowska-Szponar
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.