Literature DB >> 19144795

Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation.

Julie Carson1, Betty Lui, Linda Rosmus, Howard Rennick, Jeff Fuller.   

Abstract

An incubation time of 24 h at 35 to 38 degrees C is recommended for the optimal performance of MRSASelect (Bio-Rad) chromogenic screening agar. An additional 24 h is required to capture slow-growing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the normal hours of operation for most laboratories cannot reliably accommodate 24-h interpretation intervals. Daily agar plate interpretations are more likely to occur around 18 h and 42 h of incubation, which may compromise the performance of the chromogenic agar and negatively impact patient infection control efforts. In order to validate the importance of stringent incubation times to plate performance, we evaluated MRSASelect medium at controlled intervals of 24 and 48 h of incubation, using clinical MRSA-screening swabs. A total of 1,071 MRSA-positive and 2,733 MRSA-negative cultures were selected for analysis. Compared to 48-h-incubation results, the sensitivity and specificity of MRSASelect at 24 h were 98.3% and 98.2%, respectively. Only 19 of 1,071 (1.8%) MRSA-positive isolates required 48 h for detection. Holding 24-h negative plates an additional 24 h resulted in the workup of 253 (6.6%) pink, yet non-MRSA, colonies. The 24-h positive and negative predictive values of MRSASelect, assuming MRSA prevalences of 1, 5, and 10%, were 35.5 and 99.98%, 74.2 and 99.9%, and 85.9 and 99.8%, respectively. MRSASelect medium held for 24-h incubation is a highly sensitive and specific MRSA-screening tool. Further incubation prolongs the turnaround time for results and creates a significant amount of unnecessary work in the laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19144795      PMCID: PMC2650924          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01566-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

Review 1.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I Nahimana; P Francioli; D S Blanc
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, MRSA select, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lisa Louie; Deirdre Soares; Helen Meaney; Mary Vearncombe; Andrew E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Salt tolerance of EMRSA-16 and its effect on the sensitivity of screening cultures.

Authors:  E M Jones; K E Bowker; R Cooke; R J Marshall; D S Reeves; A P MacGowan
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Comparison of four chromogenic media for culture-based screening of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Abdessalam Cherkaoui; Gesuele Renzi; Patrice François; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  The evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals: 5 years of national surveillance.

Authors:  A E Simor; M Ofner-Agostini; E Bryce; K Green; A McGeer; M Mulvey; S Paton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Methods for identifying methicillin resistancein Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R W Smyth; G Kahlmeter; B Olsson Liljequist; B Hoffman
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Evaluation of MRSA Select, a new chromogenic medium for the detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sana Ben Nsira; Michel Dupuis; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  Prospective comparison of a new chromogenic medium, MRSASelect, to CHROMagar MRSA and mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin or cefoxitin for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Luba Stoakes; Romina Reyes; Janis Daniel; Gwen Lennox; Michael A John; Robert Lannigan; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Development and evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  John D Perry; Amie Davies; Lynne A Butterworth; Andrew L J Hopley; Audrey Nicholson; F Kate Gould
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Bio-Rad MRSASelect agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Lisa Dam; Paul D Stamper; Syed A R Shah; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.

Authors:  C Wendt; N L Havill; K C Chapin; J M Boyce; R Dickenson; U Eigner; S Schütt; A M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of Genotypic and Phenotypic Methods for Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern Odisha.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Panda; Ashoka Mahapatra; Bandana Mallick; Nirupama Chayani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Three-way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and spectra MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in nasal surveillance cultures.

Authors:  Gerald A Denys; Pamela B Renzi; Kim M Koch; Carol M Wissel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Foaming Betadine Spray as a potential agent for non-labor-intensive preoperative surgical site preparation.

Authors:  Roli Kargupta; Garret J Hull; Kyle D Rood; James Galloway; Clinton F Matthews; Paul S Dale; Shramik Sengupta
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Volker Micheel; Benedikt Hogan; Thomas Köller; Philipp Warnke; Sabine Crusius; Rebecca Hinz; Ralf Matthias Hagen; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Hagen Frickmann
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2015-07-21

7.  Analysis of reporting time for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers using ChromID MRSA.

Authors:  Yirang Lee; Jae-Seok Kim; Han-Sung Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Wonkeun Song; Kyu Man Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Automated Scoring of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Use of WASPLab Image Analysis Software.

Authors:  Matthew L Faron; Blake W Buchan; Chiara Vismara; Carla Lacchini; Alessandra Bielli; Giovanni Gesu; Theo Liebregts; Anita van Bree; Arjan Jansz; Genevieve Soucy; John Korver; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.