Literature DB >> 24170376

Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Wonil Choi1, Peter C Gordon.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined how lexical status affects the targeting of saccades during reading by using the boundary technique to vary independently the content of a letter string when seen in parafoveal preview and when directly fixated. Experiment 1 measured the skipping rate for a target word embedded in a sentence under three parafoveal preview conditions: full preview (e.g., brain-brain), pseudohomophone preview (e.g., brane-brain), and orthographic nonword control preview (e.g., brant-brain); in the first condition, the preview string was always an English word, while in the second and third conditions, it was always a nonword. Experiment 2 investigated three conditions where the preview string was always a word: full preview (e.g., beach-beach), homophone preview (e.g., beech-beach), and orthographic control preview (e.g., bench-beach). None of the letter string manipulations used to create the preview conditions in the experiments disrupted sublexical orthographic or phonological patterns. In Experiment 1, higher skipping rates were observed for the full (lexical) preview condition, which consisted of a word, than for the nonword preview conditions (pseudohomophone and orthographic control). In contrast, Experiment 2 showed no difference in skipping rates across the three types of lexical preview conditions (full, homophone, and orthographic control), although preview type did influence reading times. This pattern indicates that skipping not only depends on the presence of disrupted sublexical patterns of orthography or phonology, but also is critically dependent on processes that are sensitive to the lexical status of letter strings in the parafovea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24170376      PMCID: PMC3877716          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0494-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

1.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Y A Lee; K S Binder; J O Kim; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

4.  Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Rebecca Treiman; Brett Kessler; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Gemma Fitzsimmons; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

7.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Eye movement control during reading: a simulation of some word-targeting strategies.

Authors:  R G Reilly; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.

Authors:  S D Lima; A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Randy Tran; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Renske S Hoedemaker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

8.  Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Hong Du; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.