Literature DB >> 22015948

Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".

Brian Wynne1.   

Abstract

Midstream modulation is a form of public engagement with science which benefits from strategic application of science and technology studies (STS) insights accumulated over nearly 20 years. These have been developed from STS researchers' involvement in practical engagement processes and research with scientists, science funders, policy and other public stakeholders. The strategic aim of this specific method, to develop what is termed second-order reflexivity amongst scientist-technologists, builds upon and advances earlier more general STS work. However this method is focused and structured so as to help generate such reflexivity-over the 'upstream' questions which have been identified in other STS research as important public issues for scientific research, development and innovation-amongst practising scientists-technologists in their specialist contexts (public or private, in principle). This is a different focus from virtually all such previous work, and offers novel opportunities for those key broader issues to be opened up. The further development of these promising results depends on some important conditions such as identifying and engaging research funders and other stakeholders like affected publics in similar exercises. Implementing these conditions could connect the productive impacts of midstream modulation with wider public engagement work, including with 'uninvited' public engagement with science. It would also generate broader institutional and political changes in the larger networks of institutional actors which constitute contemporary technoscientific innovation and governance processes. All of these various broader dimensions, far beyond the laboratory alone, need to be appropriately open, committed to democratic needs, and reflexive, for the aims of midstream modulation to be achieved, whilst allowing specialists to work as specialists.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22015948     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  2 in total

1.  Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.

Authors:  B Wynne
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2001-12

2.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Authors:  Erik Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Public Health Pharmacogenomics and the Design Principles for Global Public Goods - Moving Genomics to Responsible Innovation.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Alexander Borda-Rodriguez; Edward S Dove; Lynnette R Ferguson; Farah Huzair; Vangelis G Manolopoulos; Mario Masellis; Djims Milius; Louise Warnich; Sanjeeva Srivastava
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2013-03-24

4.  Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.

Authors:  William T Lynch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Burget; Emanuele Bardone; Margus Pedaste
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Towards an Ecology of Collective Innovation: Human Variome Project (HVP), Rare Disease Consortium for Autosomal Loci (RaDiCAL) and Data-Enabled Life Sciences Alliance (DELSA).

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; David S Rosenblatt; Louise Warnich; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Ghazi O Tadmouri; Ramy K Aziz; Panga Jaipal Reddy; Aresha Manamperi; Edward S Dove; Yann Joly; Ma'n H Zawati; Candan Hızel; Yasemin Yazan; Leela John; Emmanuelle Vaast; Adam S Ptolemy; Samer A Faraj; Eugene Kolker; Richard G H Cotton
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2011-12-01

8.  Knowing when to talk? Plant genome editing as a site for pre-engagement institutional reflexivity.

Authors:  Robert D J Smith; Sarah Hartley; Patrick Middleton; Tracey Jewitt
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2021-04-03

9.  Looking Upstream: Findings from Focus Groups on Public Perceptions of Source Water Quality in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Natalie Henrich; Bev Holmes; Natalie Prystajecky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Authors:  Jack Stilgoe; Simon J Lock; James Wilsdon
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.