Literature DB >> 26956121

A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Barbara E Ribeiro1, Robert D J Smith2,3, Kate Millar2.   

Abstract

This paper makes a plea for more reflexive attempts to develop and anchor the emerging concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI). RRI has recently emerged as a buzzword in science policy, becoming a focus of concerted experimentation in many academic circles. Its performative capacity means that it is able to mobilise resources and spaces despite no common understanding of what it is or should be 'made of'. In order to support reflection and practice amongst those who are interested in and using the concept, this paper unpacks understandings of RRI across a multi-disciplinary body of peer-reviewed literature. Our analysis focuses on three key dimensions of RRI (motivations, theoretical conceptualisations and translations into practice) that remain particularly opaque. A total of 48 publications were selected through a systematic literature search and their content was qualitatively analysed. Across the literature, RRI is portrayed as a concept that embeds numerous features of existing approaches to govern and assess emerging technologies. Our analysis suggests that its greatest potential may be in its ability to unify and provide political momentum to a wide range of long-articulated ethical and policy issues. At the same time, RRI's dynamism and resulting complexity may represent its greatest challenge. Further clarification on what RRI has to offer in practice-beyond what has been offered to date-is still needed, as well as more explicit engagement with research and institutional cultures of responsibility. Such work may help to realise the high political expectations that are attached to nascent RRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emerging science and technologies; Responsibility; Responsible research and innovation; Scientific cultures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956121     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  43 in total

Review 1.  Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations.

Authors:  Adam Hedgecoe
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.885

2.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Jane Calvert; Paul Martin
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts.

Authors:  Claudia Som; Markus Berges; Qasim Chaudhry; Maria Dusinska; Teresa F Fernandes; Stig I Olsen; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.

Authors:  Fern Wickson; Ellen-Marie Forsberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Ready to put metadata on the post-2015 development agenda? Linking data publications to responsible innovation and science diplomacy.

Authors:  Vural Özdemir; Eugene Kolker; Peter J Hotez; Sophie Mohin; Barbara Prainsack; Brian Wynne; Effy Vayena; Yavuz Coşkun; Türkay Dereli; Farah Huzair; Alexander Borda-Rodriguez; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Jack Faris; Raj Ramesar; Ambroise Wonkam; Collet Dandara; Bipin Nair; Adrián Llerena; Koray Kılıç; Rekha Jain; Panga Jaipal Reddy; Kishore Gollapalli; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Ilona Kickbusch
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-01

7.  Interactive learning and action: realizing the promise of synthetic biology for global health.

Authors:  A Wieke Betten; Anneloes Roelofsen; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2013-07-27

8.  Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities.

Authors:  W Dondorp; G de Wert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.

Authors:  Des Fitzgerald; Felicity Callard
Journal:  Theory Cult Soc       Date:  2015-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective.

Authors:  Niels Mejlgaard; Malene Vinther Christensen; Roger Strand; Ivan Buljan; Mar Carrió; Marta Cayetano I Giralt; Erich Griessler; Alexander Lang; Ana Marušić; Gema Revuelta; Gemma Rodríguez; Núria Saladié; Milena Wuketich
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Working with bacteria and putting bacteria to work: The biopolitics of synthetic biology for energy in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Carmen McLeod; Brigitte Nerlich; Alison Mohr
Journal:  Energy Res Soc Sci       Date:  2017-08

3.  Synthetic biology, metaphors and responsibility.

Authors:  Carmen McLeod; Brigitte Nerlich
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.

Authors:  Ana Delgado; Heidrun Åm
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Vittorio Colizzi; Daniele Mezzana; Pavel V Ovseiko; Giovanni Caiati; Claudia Colonnello; Andrea Declich; Alastair M Buchan; Laurel Edmunds; Elena Buzan; Luiz Zerbini; Dimitar Djilianov; Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt; Krzysztof P Bielawski; Doris Elster; Maria Salvato; Luiz C Jr Alcantara; Antonella Minutolo; Marina Potestà; Elena Bachiddu; Maria J Milano; Lorna R Henderson; Vasiliki Kiparoglou; Phoebe Friesen; Mark Sheehan; Daniela Moyankova; Krasimir Rusanov; Martha Wium; Izabela Raszczyk; Igor Konieczny; Jerzy P Gwizdala; Karol Śledzik; Tanja Barendziak; Julia Birkholz; Nicklas Müller; Jürgen Warrelmann; Ute Meyer; Juliane Filser; Fernanda Khouri Barreto; Carla Montesano
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-03-07

6.  Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol.

Authors:  Barbara Ribeiro; Philip Shapira
Journal:  Technol Forecast Soc Change       Date:  2019-02

7.  AMICAI: A Method Based on Risk Analysis to Integrate Responsible Research and Innovation into the Work of Research and Innovation Practitioners.

Authors:  Christopher Brandl; Matthias Wille; Jochen Nelles; Peter Rasche; Katharina Schäfer; Frank O Flemisch; Martin Frenz; Verena Nitsch; Alexander Mertens
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Private and public values of innovation: A patent analysis of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Barbara Ribeiro; Philip Shapira
Journal:  Res Policy       Date:  2020-02

9.  Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: Towards a framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment.

Authors:  Nicholas E Matthews; Laurence Stamford; Philip Shapira
Journal:  Sustain Prod Consum       Date:  2019-10

10.  Integrated assessment of emerging science and technologies as creating learning processes among assessment communities.

Authors:  Ellen-Marie Forsberg; Barbara Ribeiro; Nils B Heyen; Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen; Erik Thorstensen; Erik de Bakker; Lars Klüver; Thomas Reiss; Volkert Beekman; Kate Millar
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.