Literature DB >> 23090750

Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Lucica Iordanescu1, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

People naturally dance to music, and research has shown that rhythmic auditory stimuli facilitate production of precisely timed body movements. If motor mechanisms are closely linked to auditory temporal processing, just as auditory temporal processing facilitates movement production, producing action might reciprocally enhance auditory temporal sensitivity. We tested this novel hypothesis with a standard temporal-bisection paradigm, in which the slope of the temporal-bisection function provides a measure of temporal sensitivity. The bisection slope for auditory time perception was steeper when participants initiated each auditory stimulus sequence via a keypress than when they passively heard each sequence, demonstrating that initiating action enhances auditory temporal sensitivity. This enhancement is specific to the auditory modality, because voluntarily initiating each sequence did not enhance visual temporal sensitivity. A control experiment ruled out the possibility that tactile sensation associated with a keypress increased auditory temporal sensitivity. Taken together, these results demonstrate a unique reciprocal relationship between auditory time perception and motor mechanisms. As auditory perception facilitates precisely timed movements, generating action enhances auditory temporal sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23090750      PMCID: PMC3558542          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0330-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.

Authors:  T B Penney; J Gibbon; W H Meck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  How do we tell time?

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Uma R Karmarkar
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Motor timing learned without motor training.

Authors:  D V Meegan; R N Aslin; R A Jacobs
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Voluntary action expands perceived duration of its sensory consequence.

Authors:  Junghyun Park; Madeleine Schlag-Rey; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

6.  Manual chronostasis: tactile perception precedes physical contact.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  The neural basis of temporal processing.

Authors:  Michael D Mauk; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 2. Evidence from sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Gisa Aschersleben; Paul Bertelson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Intentional action: conscious experience and neural prediction.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Sam Clark
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-12

10.  Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; Stéphanie Tourret; John Wearden
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Trained to keep a beat: movement-related enhancements to timing perception in percussionists and non-percussionists.

Authors:  Fiona C Manning; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

2.  Temporal prediction abilities are mediated by motor effector and rhythmic expertise.

Authors:  Fiona C Manning; Jennifer Harris; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Time to imagine moving: Simulated motor activity affects time perception.

Authors:  Michiel M Spapé; Ville J Harjunen; Niklas Ravaja
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Action-based effects on music perception.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Maes; Marc Leman; Caroline Palmer; Marcelo M Wanderley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-03

5.  Motor contributions to the temporal precision of auditory attention.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Charles E Schroeder; Valentin Wyart
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Who hit the ball out? An egocentric temporal order bias.

Authors:  Ty Y Tang; Michael K McBeath
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Reducing bias in auditory duration reproduction by integrating the reproduced signal.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Stephanie Ganzenmüller; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Self-Produced Time Intervals Are Perceived as More Variable and/or Shorter Depending on Temporal Context in Subsecond and Suprasecond Ranges.

Authors:  Keita Mitani; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.