Literature DB >> 11129373

Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.

T B Penney1, J Gibbon, W H Meck.   

Abstract

The effects of signal modality on duration classification in college students were studied with the duration bisection task. When auditory and visual signals were presented in the same test session and shared common anchor durations, visual signals were classified as shorter than equivalent duration auditory signals. This occurred when auditory and visual signals were presented sequentially in the same test session and when presented simultaneously but asynchronously. Presentation of a single modality signal within a test session, or both modalities but with different anchor durations did not result in classification differences. The authors posit a model in which auditory and visual signals drive an internal clock at different rates. The clock rate difference is due to an attentional effect on the mode switch and is revealed only when the memories for the short and long anchor durations consist of a mix of contributions from accumulations generated by both the fast auditory and slower visual clock rates. When this occurs auditory signals seem longer than visual signals relative to the composite memory representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129373     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.6.1770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  82 in total

1.  Perceptual learning in temporal discrimination: asymmetric cross-modal transfer from audition to vision.

Authors:  Daniel Bratzke; Tanja Seifried; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Carving the clock at its component joints: neural bases for interval timing.

Authors:  Elaine B Wencil; H Branch Coslett; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Processing of empty and filled time intervals in pigeons.

Authors:  Douglas S Grant; Diane C Talarico
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  An internal clock for predictive saccades is established identically by auditory or visual information.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jung-Eun Lee; Adrian Lasker; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Disruption of temporal processing in a subject with probable frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Prenatal choline supplementation increases sensitivity to time by reducing non-scalar sources of variance in adult temporal processing.

Authors:  Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Temporal memory averaging and post-encoding alterations in temporal expectation.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; Alexandra M Henning
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.