Literature DB >> 15204118

Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults.

Sylvie Droit-Volet1, Stéphanie Tourret, John Wearden.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated the effect of modality on temporal discrimination in children aged 5 and 8 years and adults using a bisection task with visual and auditory stimuli ranging from 200 to 800 ms. In the first session, participants were required to compare stimulus durations with standard durations presented in the same modality (within-modality session), and in the second session in different modalities (cross-modal session). Psychophysical functions were orderly in all age groups, with the proportion of long responses (judgement that a duration was more similar to the long than to the short standard) increasing with the stimulus duration, although functions were flatter in the 5-year-olds than in the 8-year-olds and adults. Auditory stimuli were judged to be longer than visual stimuli in all age groups. The statistical results and a theoretical model suggested that this modality effect was due to differences in the pacemaker speed of the internal clock. The 5-year-olds also judged visual stimuli as more variable than auditory ones, indicating that their temporal sensitivity was lower in the visual than in the auditory modality. Copyright 2004 The Experimental Psychology Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204118     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  23 in total

1.  Cognitive timing: neuropsychology and anatomic basis.

Authors:  H Branch Coslett; Jeff Shenton; Tamarah Dyer; Martin Wiener
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Reward-Driven Arousal Impacts Preparation to Perform a Task via Amygdala-Caudate Mechanisms.

Authors:  Noriya Watanabe; Jamil P Bhanji; Hideki Ohira; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Recent advances in understanding emotion-driven temporal distortions.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

4.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

5.  Interference between auditory and visual duration judgements suggests a common code for time.

Authors:  Pavlos C Filippopoulos; Pamela Hallworth; Sukye Lee; John H Wearden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-22

6.  Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Xu Li; Ziyong Lin; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-08-24

7.  Psychomotor functions and interval timing in patients receiving intravenous anesthesia for endoscopic procedures: the pilot study.

Authors:  Włodzimierz Płotek; Marcin Cybulski; Anna Kluzik; Małgorzata Grześkowiak; Jacek Jelonek; Wojciech Switała; Jakub Janicki; Leon Drobnik
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-26

8.  Subjectivity of time perception: a visual emotional orchestration.

Authors:  Anna Lambrechts; Nathalie Mella; Viviane Pouthas; Marion Noulhiane
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-16

9.  Human performance on the temporal bisection task.

Authors:  Charles D Kopec; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Alexithymia Is Linked with a Negative Bias for Past and Current Events in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Silvia Barchetta; Gabriella Martino; Giuseppe Craparo; Mohammad A Salehinejad; Michael A Nitsche; Carmelo M Vicario
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.