Literature DB >> 14511843

Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 2. Evidence from sensorimotor synchronization.

Gisa Aschersleben1, Paul Bertelson.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we measured audio-visual crossmodal attraction on the time dimension, using a sensorimotor synchronization task. Synchronization performance made it possible to split up the total crossmodal attraction (demonstrated in earlier studies through inter-modal temporal order judgments) into its modality-specific components, the auditory bias of the visual event's perceived time of occurrence and the visual bias of the auditory event's perceived time of occurrence. Participants were asked to produce tapping movements in synchrony with a sequence of isochronously repeated pacing signals. In Experiment 1, pacing signals were light flashes, each preceded or followed, at one of several stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), by an auditory distracter that the participant was instructed to ignore. The timing of the tap was, in spite of that instruction, strongly biased toward the distracter. In Experiment 2, the converse task was used. The pacing signals were auditory and the to be ignored distracters, light flashes. The timing of the taps was biased significantly here also toward the distracter, but to a much lesser extent. Taken together, these results clearly demonstrate that audition plays a bigger role than vision in temporal ventriloquism and is probably generally superior to vision for processing the temporal dimension of events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14511843     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00131-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  21 in total

Review 1.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

2.  Combining multisensory temporal information for movement synchronisation.

Authors:  Alan M Wing; Michail Doumas; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

4.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  On the interplay of visuospatial and audiotemporal dominance: Evidence from a multimodal kappa effect.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Katrina R Quinn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

8.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli.

Authors:  Marianne Latinus; Rufin VanRullen; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 10.  The 'when' parietal pathway explored by lesion studies.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Vincent Walsh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.