Literature DB >> 27909748

Temporal prediction abilities are mediated by motor effector and rhythmic expertise.

Fiona C Manning1, Jennifer Harris2, Michael Schutz2,3.   

Abstract

Motor synchronization is a critical part of musical performance and listening. Recently, motor control research has described how movements that contain more available degrees of freedom are more accurately timed. Previously, we demonstrated that stick tapping improves perception in a timing detection task, where percussionists greatly outperformed non-percussionists only when tapping along. Since most synchronization studies implement finger tapping to examine simple motor synchronization, here we completed a similar task where percussionists and non-percussionists synchronized using finger tapping; movement with fewer degrees of freedom than stick tapping. Percussionists and non-percussionists listened to an isochronous beat sequence and identified the timing of a probe tone. On half of the trials, they tapped along with their index finger, and on the other half of the trials, they listened without moving prior to making timing judgments. We found that both groups benefited from tapping overall. Interestingly, percussionists performed only marginally better than did non-percussionists when finger tapping and no different when listening alone, differing from past studies reporting highly superior timing abilities in percussionists. Additionally, we found that percussionist finger tapping was less variable and less asynchronous than was non-percussionist tapping. Moreover, in both groups finger tapping was more variable and more asynchronous than stick tapping in our previous study. This study demonstrates that the motor effector implemented in tapping studies affects not only synchronization abilities, but also subsequent prediction abilities. We discuss these findings in light of effector-specific training and degrees of freedom in motor timing, both of which impact timing abilities to different extents.

Keywords:  Finger tapping; Motor effector; Movement timing; Musical training; Sensorimotor integration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909748     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4845-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: effects of intention, attention, and awareness.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-04

4.  Sensorimotor synchronization and perception of timing: effects of music training and task experience.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Trained to keep a beat: movement-related enhancements to timing perception in percussionists and non-percussionists.

Authors:  Fiona C Manning; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

6.  Coordination of degrees of freedom and stabilization of task variables in a complex motor skill: expertise-related differences in cello bowing.

Authors:  Julius Verrel; Steven Pologe; Wayne Manselle; Ulman Lindenberger; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: evidence for a multiple-look model.

Authors:  C Drake; M C Botte
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

Review 8.  Predictive motor control of sensory dynamics in auditory active sensing.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Troy A Hackett; Yoshinao Kajikawa; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Perceptual differences in sequential stimuli across patients with musician's and writer's cramp.

Authors:  Vanessa K Lim; John L Bradshaw; Michael E R Nicholls; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Timing and trajectory in rhythm production.

Authors:  Michail Doumas; Alan M Wing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Commentary: Sound-making actions lead to immediate plastic changes of neuromagnetic evoked responses and induced β-band oscillations during perception.

Authors:  Rebecca W Gelding; Yanan Sun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Sounds familiar(?): Expertise with specific musical genres modulates timing perception and micro-level synchronization to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Anne Danielsen; Kristian Nymoen; Martin Torvik Langerød; Eirik Jacobsen; Mats Johansson; Justin London
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Intrinsic Rhythmicity Predicts Synchronization-Continuation Entrainment Performance.

Authors:  Trevor McPherson; Dorita Berger; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.