Literature DB >> 29731323

On the variation in maternal birth canal in vivo viscoelastic properties and their effect on the predicted length of active second stage and levator ani tears.

Paige V Tracy1, Shreya Wadhwani2, Jourdan Triebwasser3, Alan S Wineman4, Francisco J Orejuela5, Susan M Ramin6, John O DeLancey7, James A Ashton-Miller8.   

Abstract

The pubovisceral muscles (PVM) help form the distal maternal birth canal. It is not known why 13% of vaginal deliveries end in PVM tears, so insights are needed to better prevent them because their sequelae can lead to pelvic organ prolapse later in life. In this paper we provide the first quantification of the variation in in vivo viscoelastic properties of the intact distal birth canal in healthy nulliparous women using Fung's Quasilinear Viscoelastic Theory and a secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial of constant force birth canal dilation to 8 cm diameter in the first stage of labor in 26 nullipara. We hypothesized that no significant inter-individual variation would be found in the long time constant, τ2, which characterizes how long it takes the birth canal to be dilated by the fetal head. That hypothesis was rejected because τ2 values ranged 20-fold above and below the median value. These data were input to a biomechanical model to calculate how such variations affect the predicted length of the active second stage of labor as well as PVM tear risk. The results show there was a 100-fold change in the predicted length of active second stage for the shortest and longest τ2 values, with a noticeable increase for τ2 values over 1000 s. The correlation coefficent between predicted and observed second stage durations was 0.51. We conclude that τ2 is a strong theoretical contributor to the time a mother has to push in order to deliver a fetal head larger than her birth canal, and a weak predictor of PVM tear risk.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth; Injury; Levator ani; Second stage duration; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29731323      PMCID: PMC5962441          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  36 in total

1.  Biomechanical modeling of the rectum for the design of a novel artificial anal sphincter.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Guozheng Yan; Hua Liu; Banghua Yang; Yujuan Zhao; Nianting Luo
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.

Authors:  Julie Senécal; Xu Xiong; William D Fraser
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Pressures on the fetal head during normal labor.

Authors:  A Rempen; M Kraus
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  Does episiotomy protect against injury of the levator ani muscle in normal vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jordi Cassadó; Antoni Pessarrodona; Monica Rodriguez-Carballeira; Lourdes Hinojosa; Gemma Manrique; Adriana Márquez; Marina Macias
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  A comparison of the effect of age on levator ani and obturator internus muscle cross-sectional areas and volumes in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Vikky C Morris; Meghan P Murray; John O L Delancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Vincenzo Berghella; Uma M Reddy; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Zhaohui Lu; Matthew K Hoffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Vaginal birth after cesarean for cephalopelvic disproportion: effect of birth weight difference on success.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Jeffrey F Peipert; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae.

Authors:  James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Irina A Buhimschi; Andrew M Malinow; Jerome N Kopelman; Carl P Weiner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Damage Models for Soft Tissues: A Survey.

Authors:  Wenguang Li
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pelvic floor muscle injury during a difficult labor. Can tissue fatigue damage play a role?

Authors:  Maria C P Vila Pouca; Marco P L Parente; Renato M Natal Jorge; John O L DeLancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  On the management of maternal pushing during the second stage of labor: a biomechanical study considering passive tissue fatigue damage accumulation.

Authors:  Maria C P Vila Pouca; João P S Ferreira; Marco P L Parente; Renato M Natal Jorge; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 10.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.