Literature DB >> 18507583

Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.

Man Wah Pang1, Tse Ngong Leung, Tze Kin Lau, Tony Kwok Hang Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A woman's childbirth experience has an influence on her future preferred mode of delivery. This study aimed to identify determinants for women who changed from preferring a planned vaginal birth to an elective cesarean section after their first childbirth.
METHODS: This prospective longitudinal observational study involved two units that provide obstetric care in Hong Kong. A mail survey was sent to 259 women 6 months after their first childbirth. These women had participated in a longitudinal cohort study that examined their preference for elective cesarean section in the antenatal period of their first pregnancies. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify determinants for women who changed from preferring vaginal birth to elective cesarean section.
RESULTS: Twenty-four percent (23.8%, 95% CI 18.4-29.3) of women changed from preferring vaginal birth to elective cesarean section after their first childbirth. Determinants found to be positively associated with this change included actual delivery by elective cesarean section (OR 106.3, 95% CI 14.7-767.4) intrauterine growth restriction (OR 19.5, 95% CI 1.1-353.6), actual delivery by emergency cesarean section (OR 8.4, 95% CI 3.4-20.6), higher family income (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-8.8), use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-6.8), and higher trait anxiety score (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.3). The most important reason for women who changed from preferring vaginal birth to elective cesarean section was fear of vaginal birth (24.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of women changed their preferred mode of delivery after their first childbirth. Apart from reducing the number of cesarean sections in nulliparous women, prompt provision of education to women who had complications and investigations into fear factors during vaginal birth might help in reducing women's wish to change to elective cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18507583     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  27 in total

1.  Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Maternal childbirth experience and time in labor: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Sara Carlhäll; Marie Nelson; Maria Svenvik; Daniel Axelsson; Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Psychological Predictors of Intention to Deliver Vaginally through the Extended Parallel Process Model: A Mixed-Method Approach in Pregnant Iranian Women.

Authors:  Sepideh Hajian; Mohammad Shariati; Khadijeh Mirzaii Najmabadi; Masud Yunesian; Mohammad Esmaeel Ajami
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-11

4.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Charles Taft; Liselotte Bergqvist; Håkan Lilja; Marie Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The intelligence quotient of school aged children delivered by cesarean section and vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Nayereh Khadem; Talaat Khadivzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

8.  Socioeconomic position early in adolescence and mode of delivery later in life: findings from a Portuguese birth cohort.

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Susana Silva; Milton Severo; Henrique Barros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women.

Authors:  Wendy A Hall; Kathrin Stoll; Eileen K Hutton; Helen Brown
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.