Literature DB >> 24750358

The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Joyce K Edmonds1, Summer S Hawkins, Bruce B Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to examine the likelihood of primary cesarean delivery for women at low risk for the procedure in Massachusetts.
METHODS: Birth certificate data for all births from 1996 to 2010 that were nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV; N = 427,393) were used to conduct logistic regression models to assess the likelihood of a cesarean delivery for each of the 31 ethnic groups relative to self-identified "American" mothers. The results were compared with broad classifications of race/ethnicity more commonly employed in research.
RESULTS: While 23.3 percent of American women had primary cesarean deliveries, cesarean delivery rates varied from 12.9 percent for Cambodian to 32.4 percent for Nigerian women. Women from 21 of 30 ethnic groups had higher odds of a primary cesarean (range of adjusted odds ratios [AORs] 1.09-1.77), while only Chinese, Cambodian, and Japanese women had lower odds (range of AORs 0.66-0.92), compared with self-identified "Americans." Using broad race/ethnicity categories, Non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and "Other" women had higher odds of cesarean delivery relative to Non-Hispanic white women (range of AORs 1.12-1.47), while there were no differences for Asian or Pacific Islander women.
CONCLUSIONS: Detailed maternal ethnicity explains the variation in NTSV cesarean delivery rates better than broad race/ethnicity categories. Different patterns of cesarean delivery between ethnic groups suggest cultural specificity related to birth culture.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean; ethnicity; health disparity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24750358      PMCID: PMC4139447          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  44 in total

Review 1.  Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research.

Authors:  S S Lin; J L Kelsey
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance.

Authors:  D C Aron; H S Gordon; D L DiGiuseppe; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Quality measurement: what it means for obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Rebekah E Gee; Reva Winkler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean?

Authors:  K Hopkins
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Cesarean section among immigrants in Norway.

Authors:  S Vangen; C Stoltenberg; A Skrondal; P Magnus; B Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience at one U.S. Institution.

Authors:  Sierra Washington; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  The role of women's attitudinal profiles in satisfaction with the quality of their antenatal and intrapartum care.

Authors:  Helen M Haines; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Julie F Pallant; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The Brazilian preference: cesarean delivery among immigrants in Portugal.

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Sofia Correia; César G Victora; Henrique Barros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.

Authors:  Isabel A Cáceres; Mariana Arcaya; Eugene Declercq; Candice M Belanoff; Vanitha Janakiraman; Bruce Cohen; Jeffrey Ecker; Lauren A Smith; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer Sherburne Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

2.  Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery and actual delivery mode: Variation by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Rachel R Hardeman; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  The Health Behaviors of Ethnically Diverse Women at Increased Risk of Gestational Diabetes: The Behaviors Affecting Baby and You (B.A.B.Y.) Study.

Authors:  Carrie J Nobles; Bess H Marcus; Edward J Stanek; Barry Braun; Brian W Whitcomb; JoAnn E Manson; Glenn Markenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-05

4.  Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-01-05

5.  Prepregnancy Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Odds of Cesarean Delivery in Hispanic Women.

Authors:  Megan W Harvey; Barry Braun; Karen A Ertel; Penelope S Pekow; Glenn Markenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Racial disparities in caesarean delivery among nulliparous women that delivered at term: cross-sectional decomposition analysis of Nebraska birth records from 2005-2014.

Authors:  Corrine Hanson; Kaeli Samson; Ann L Anderson-Berry; Rebecca A Slotkowski; Dejun Su
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland.

Authors:  Sarah-Jo Sinnott; Aoife Brick; Richard Layte; Nathan Cunningham; Michael J Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Paradox lost on the U.S.-Mexico border: U.S. Latinas and cesarean rates.

Authors:  Theresa Morris; Amanda Gomez; Miriam Naiman-Sessions; Christine H Morton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Cesarean effects on adolescents' birth experiences: counterfactual analysis.

Authors:  John P Connolly; Cheryl Anderson
Journal:  Trends Psychiatry Psychother       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

10.  Caesarean delivery in a migration context: the role of prior delivery in the host country.

Authors:  Lorraine Poncet; Henri Panjo; Armelle Andro; Virginie Ringa
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.