Literature DB >> 23065030

Knowledge and perceptions of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer risk in adolescent girls.

Angela R Bradbury1, Linda Patrick-Miller, Brian L Egleston, Lisa A Schwartz, Colleen B Sands, Rebecca Shorter, Cynthia W Moore, Lisa Tuchman, Paula Rauch, Shreya Malhotra, Brianne Rowan, Stephanie Van Decker, Helen Schmidheiser, Lisa Bealin, Patrick Sicilia, Mary B Daly.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests early events might modify adult breast cancer risk and many adolescents learn of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer. Little is known about how adolescent girls understand and respond to breast cancer risk. Semi-structured interviews with 11-19 year-old girls at high-risk and population-risk for breast cancer evaluated knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer risk and risk modification. Framework analysis and descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze open-ended responses. Risk group and age differences were evaluated by Fisher's exact and McNemar's tests. Fifty-four girls (86 % of invited), 35 high-risk (65 %), and 19 population-risk (35 %) completed interviews. The most frequently reported risk for breast cancer was family history/hereditary predisposition (66 %). Only 17 % of girls were aware of BRCA1/2 genes. The majority (76 %) of high-risk girls perceive themselves to be at increased risk for breast cancer, compared to 22 % of population-risk girls (p = 0.001). Half of girls reported that women can get breast cancer before 20-years-old. The majority believe there are things women (70 %) and girls (67 %) can do to prevent breast cancer. Mother was the most frequently reported source of information for breast cancer among both high-risk (97 %) and population-risk (89 %) girls. In this study, many high-risk girls perceive themselves to be at increased risk for breast cancer, and many girls believe that breast cancer can occur in teens. Yet, most girls believe there are things women and girls can do to prevent breast cancer. Research evaluating the impact of awareness and perceptions of breast cancer risk on psychosocial, health, and risk behaviors is needed to develop strategies to optimize responses to cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065030      PMCID: PMC3513641          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2254-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  49 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Mothers and daughters from breast cancer families: a qualitative study of their perceptions of risks and benefits associated with minor's participation in genetic susceptibility research.

Authors:  G Geller; E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; L S Wissow; G Fraser
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Whatever happened to qualitative description?

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 4.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  How much of a contribution do exposures experienced between conception and adolescence make to the burden of cancer in adults?

Authors:  Christopher P Wild
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The child's worries about the mother's breast cancer: sources of distress in school-age children.

Authors:  E H Zahlis
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; C Hughes; D Main; C Snyder; J F Lynch; H T Lynch; C Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-03

8.  Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; B N Peshkin; R Streisand; C Lerman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  "Other" breast cancer susceptibility genes: searching for more holy grail.

Authors:  K L Nathanson; B L Weber
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Informing women about their breast cancer risks: truth and consequences.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; M Biradavolu; K Fenn; P Keller; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001
View more
  13 in total

1.  Psychosocial Adjustment in School-age Girls With a Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa Schwartz; Brian Egleston; Colleen Burke Sands; Wendy K Chung; Gord Glendon; Jasmine A McDonald; Cynthia Moore; Paula Rauch; Lisa Tuchman; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Caren J Frost; Theresa H M Keegan; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Esther M John; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Psychosocial Adjustment and Perceived Risk Among Adolescent Girls From Families With BRCA1/2 or Breast Cancer History.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Brian L Egleston; Dare Henry-Moss; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Lisa Tuchman; Cynthia Moore; Paula K Rauch; Rebecca Shorter; Kelsey Karpink; Colleen Burke Sands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Development of a Tool to Guide Parents Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation Share Genetic Results with Underage Children.

Authors:  Ariane Santerre-Theil; Karine Bouchard; Dominique St-Pierre; Anne-Marie Drolet; Jocelyne Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Should Genetic Testing be Offered for Children? The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Claire I Viadro; Kristin Zelley; Jessica Valdez; Belinda Mandrell; Carol A Ford; Kim E Nichols
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Issues Arising in Psychological Consultations to Help Parents Talk to Minor and Young Adult Children about their Cancer Genetic Test Result: a Guide to Providers.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Opportunities During Early Life for Cancer Prevention: Highlights From a Series of Virtual Meetings With Experts.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Natasha D Buchanan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A survey of genetic counselors about the needs of 18-25 year olds from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Rachel Ratner; Lindsey M Hoskins; Caroline Lieber
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Cancer understanding among Japanese students based on a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Koshu Sugisaki; Seiji Ueda; Hirofumi Monobe; Hiroko Yako-Suketomo; Takashi Eto; Masaki Watanabe; Ryoichi Mori
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.674

10.  The LEGACY Girls Study: Growth and Development in the Context of Breast Cancer Family History.

Authors:  Esther M John; Mary Beth Terry; Theresa H M Keegan; Angela R Bradbury; Julia A Knight; Wendy K Chung; Caren J Frost; Lothar Lilge; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Alice S Whittemore; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Irene L Andrulis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.