Literature DB >> 10940958

Whatever happened to qualitative description?

M Sandelowski1.   

Abstract

The general view of descriptive research as a lower level form of inquiry has influenced some researchers conducting qualitative research to claim methods they are really not using and not to claim the method they are using: namely, qualitative description. Qualitative descriptive studies have as their goal a comprehensive summary of events in the everyday terms of those events. Researchers conducting qualitative descriptive studies stay close to their data and to the surface of words and events. Qualitative descriptive designs typically are an eclectic but reasonable combination of sampling, and data collection, analysis, and re-presentation techniques. Qualitative descriptive study is the method of choice when straight descriptions of phenomena are desired. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons,

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940958     DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  1966 in total

1.  Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  The power of the liver transplant waiting list: a case presentation.

Authors:  Lissi Hansen; Yi Yan; Susan J Rosenkranz
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  'Get alongside us', women's experiences of being overweight and pregnant in Sydney, Australia.

Authors:  Annie Mills; Virginia A Schmied; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Authors:  Anne Reb; Nora Ruel; Marwan Fakih; Lily Lai; Ravi Salgia; Betty Ferrell; Sagus Sampath; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.398

5.  Patients' engagement in primary care: powerlessness and compounding jeopardy. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicolette F Sheridan; Timothy W Kenealy; Jacquie D Kidd; Jacqueline I G Schmidt-Busby; Jennifer E Hand; Deborah L Raphael; Ann M McKillop; Harold H Rea
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Development of a Systems Science Curriculum to Engage Rural African American Teens in Understanding and Addressing Childhood Obesity Prevention.

Authors:  Leah Frerichs; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Tiffany L Young; Gaurav Dave; Doris Stith; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Patient views on financial relationships between surgeons and surgical device manufacturers.

Authors:  Mark W Camp; Allan E Gross; Martin F McKneally
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Testing Tele-Savvy: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariya A Kovaleva; Elizabeth Bilsborough; Patricia C Griffiths; Joe Nocera; Melinda Higgins; Fayron Epps; Katie Kilgore; Allison Lindauer; Darby Morhardt; Raj C Shah; Kenneth Hepburn
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Inconsistent role modeling of professionalism in family medicine residency: Resident perspectives from 2 Ontario sites.

Authors:  Stephen Marisette; Muhammad Mizanur Shuvra; Joanna Sale; Jeremy Rezmovitz; Donatus Mutasingwa; John Maxted
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Emerging Adult Women's Views-of-Self in Intimate Partner Relationships That Are Troubled.

Authors:  Allison McCord Stafford; Claire Burke Draucker
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 1.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.