Literature DB >> 28303452

Should Genetic Testing be Offered for Children? The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Melissa A Alderfer1,2,3,4, Robert B Lindell5, Claire I Viadro6, Kristin Zelley7, Jessica Valdez8, Belinda Mandrell9, Carol A Ford5,10, Kim E Nichols7,5,8.   

Abstract

Whether children should be offered genetic testing for cancer risk is much debated but young voices are rarely heard in these conversations. The current study explored perspectives of genetic testing held by adolescents and emerging adults in families with Li Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Twelve 12- to 25-year-olds in families with LFS completed qualitative interviews for this study. All believed that testing should be offered for children but many qualified this statement saying parental approval would be needed and testing should be optional. Genetic testing was seen as way to learn of risk status, allow for disease prevention efforts, and reduce uncertainty and anxiety. Perceived disadvantages included negative emotions associated with the testing result. Participants generally felt that children should be involved in the testing decision, but that parents could unilaterally decide to have a child tested in certain circumstances (e.g., young age, high risk). All who were aware of having been tested and of their test result (n = 7; 4 positive) said testing had no negative impact on their outlook and they agreed with the decision to undergo testing. Implications of these findings for clinical practice and future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer predisposition; Children/adolescents; Genetic testing; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; Psychosocial impact; TP53 gene

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303452     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0091-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

Review 1.  Genomic medicine--an updated primer.

Authors:  W Gregory Feero; Alan E Guttmacher; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: mental health, psychosocial functioning and reactions to genetic risk in adolescents.

Authors:  H Gjone; T H Diseth; O Fausa; T S Nøvik; A Heiberg
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Jennifer E Axilbund; Eileen Bryant; Saundra Buys; Charis Eng; Susan Friedman; Laura J Esserman; Carolyn D Farrell; James M Ford; Judy E Garber; Joanne M Jeter; Wendy Kohlmann; Patrick M Lynch; P Kelly Marcom; Lisle M Nabell; Kenneth Offit; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Rebecca Sutphen; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Anita Villani; Uri Tabori; Joshua Schiffman; Adam Shlien; Joseph Beyene; Harriet Druker; Ana Novokmet; Jonathan Finlay; David Malkin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

Authors:  H A Hamann; R T Croyle; V L Venne; B J Baty; K R Smith; J R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05-01

7.  Learning of your parent's BRCA mutation during adolescence or early adulthood: a study of offspring experiences.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Kimberly Pawlowski; Comfort N Ibe; Shelly A Cummings; Fay Hlubocky; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: 11 year follow-up of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Anita Villani; Ari Shore; Jonathan D Wasserman; Derek Stephens; Raymond H Kim; Harriet Druker; Bailey Gallinger; Anne Naumer; Wendy Kohlmann; Ana Novokmet; Uri Tabori; Marta Tijerin; Mary-Louise C Greer; Jonathan L Finlay; Joshua D Schiffman; David Malkin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Adolescents and genetic testing: what do they think about it?

Authors:  Asaff Harel; Dianne Abuelo; Alessandra Kazura
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Family Health Leaders: Lessons on Living with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome across Generations.

Authors:  Ashley Pantaleao; Jennifer L Young; Norman B Epstein; Mae Carlson; Renée C Bremer; Payal P Khincha; June A Peters; Mark H Greene; Kevin Roy; Maria Isabel Achatz; Sharon A Savage; Allison Werner-Lin
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 2.  Germline Genetics and Childhood Cancer: Emerging Cancer Predisposition Syndromes and Psychosocial Impacts.

Authors:  Sarah G Mitchell; Bojana Pencheva; Christopher C Porter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis of Germline Predisposition to Hematopoietic Malignancies: The University of Chicago Experience.

Authors:  Ami V Desai; Melody Perpich; Lucy A Godley
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Parent-Child Communication and Reproductive Considerations in Families with Genetic Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Taylor M Dattilo; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Alison Gehred; Amani Sampson; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kristin Zajo; Megan E Sutter; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Molly Gardner; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Predictive Testing for Tumor Predisposition Syndromes in Pediatric Relatives: An Asian Experience.

Authors:  Jianbang Chiang; Jeanette Yuen; Tarryn Shaw; Hui Xuan Goh; Shao-Tzu Li; Eliza Courtney; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Selection criteria for assembling a pediatric cancer predisposition syndrome gene panel.

Authors:  Anna Byrjalsen; Illja J Diets; Jette Bakhuizen; Thomas van Overeem Hansen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Ulrik Stoltze; Roland P Kuiper; Johannes H M Merks; Karin Wadt; Marjolijn Jongmans
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.