Literature DB >> 25011978

A survey of genetic counselors about the needs of 18-25 year olds from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Allison Werner-Lin1, Rachel Ratner, Lindsey M Hoskins, Caroline Lieber.   

Abstract

As a result of modern treatments, the life of women who test positive for BRCA mutations may be plotted along the arc of preventive medicine rather than the slope of diagnostics. Despite evidence supporting the benefits of risk reduction, protocols for early detection and prevention among women from families affected by hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are not yet proven, and clinical trials have not been undertaken for patients aged 18 to 25. The absence of psychosocial data may leave genetic counselors without uniform guidance on how to manage the care of these patients. This project sought to investigate perspectives on counseling 18-25 year-old patients from families with hereditary cancer syndromes, with specific emphasis on HBOC, given their unique developmental, familial, and medical challenges. Certified genetic counselors were recruited through the NSGC's Cancer Genetics Special Interest Group listserv. Researchers constructed an online survey which included 41 items and elicited information about: counselor demographics, training, and practice settings; approaches to cancer risk assessment; and common challenges in work with 18- to 25-year-old patients. The survey was also informed by previous work by researchers with 18 to 25-year-olds with BRCA gene mutations. Eighty-six surveys were completed. Researchers used a combination of grounded theory and content analysis for open-ended responses, supported and triangulated with statistical analysis to maximize the interpretation of data. Genetic counselors who responded to this survey experience 18-25 year old patients presenting for cancer risk assessment differently than older patients, and some reported adapting their counseling style to address these differences. Respondents differed in the extent to which they felt well-versed in the developmental needs of patients in this age group. Respondents aged 39 and under reported feeling familiar with this stage in life, having more recently completed it; respondents aged 40 and over reported they were less familiar with, and more interested in learning about, this age group. A primary challenge in cancer risk assessment of these patients, reported primarily by counselors aged 39 and under, is navigating family dynamics in counseling sessions and addressing the developmentally labile young adult. With respect to BRCA-related cancer risk, where penetrance is incomplete, onset in early adulthood is rare. Evidence-based treatment/prevention options exist, but providers may not have clarity regarding how or when to provide directive counsel. A rich understanding of the themes inherent in how people grow and change over time might enhance the counselor's capacity to assess patients and their family members. The integration of a developmental approach to genetic counseling has the potential to reduce the imperative for non-directive counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011978     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9739-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  Who are the next generation of genetic counselors? A survey of students.

Authors:  Melanie Lega; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Erin E Ward; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Quality of life and autonomy in emerging adults with early-onset neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Darcy J Huismann; Jane P Sheldon; Beverly M Yashar; Kimberly Amburgey; James J Dowling; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; J P Costantino; J Bryant; R Croyle; L Freedman; K Helzlsouer; V Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  'Cancer doesn't have an age': genetic testing and cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women aged 18-24.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey M Hoskins; Maya H Doyle; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2012-04-30

6.  Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Shiloh; L Koehly; J Jenkins; J Martin; D Hadley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Caregiving by teens for family members with Huntington disease.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Lioness Ayres; Janet Specht; Kathleen Sparbel; Mary Lou Klimek
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.818

9.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Mark E Robson; Johanna Lee; Judy E Garber; Claudine Isaacs; D Gareth Evans; Henry Lynch; Rosalind A Eeles; Susan L Neuhausen; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Joanne L Blum; Paul Sabbatini; Richard R Barakat; Clifford Hudis; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Breast self-examination in relation to the occurrence of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; N S Weiss; B E Storer; D Scholes; B E Young; L F Voigt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-02-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults: a survey of young adults and parents.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Outcomes of support groups for carriers of BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants and their relatives: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedetta Bertonazzi; Daniela Turchetti; Lea Godino
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Understanding the Needs of Young Women Regarding Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Testing: Convergence and Divergence among Patient-Counselor Perceptions and the Promise of Peer Support.

Authors:  Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Kantoniony Rabemananjara; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.