Literature DB >> 19026673

Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.

Antje Nuthmann1, Ralf Engbert.   

Abstract

In this article, we revisit the mindless reading paradigm from the perspective of computational modeling. In the standard version of the paradigm, participants read sentences in both their normal version as well as the transformed (or mindless) version where each letter is replaced with a z. z-String scanning shares the oculomotor requirements with reading but none of the higher-level lexical and semantic processes. Here we use the z-string scanning task to validate the SWIFT model of saccade generation [Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813] as an example for an advanced theory of eye-movement control in reading. We test the central assumption of spatially distributed processing across an attentional gradient proposed by the SWIFT model. Key experimental results like prolonged average fixation durations in z-string scanning compared to normal reading and the existence of a string-length effect on fixation durations and probabilities were reproduced by the model, which lends support to the model's assumptions on visual processing. Moreover, simulation results for patterns of regressive saccades in z-string scanning confirm SWIFT's concept of activation field dynamics for the selection of saccade targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026673     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

4.  Models of the reading process.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11

5.  Eye-Movement Control in RAN and Reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke; Regina Henry
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-08

6.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Do your eyes give you away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading.

Authors:  Lena Steindorf; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

8.  The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Rutvik H Desai; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  No Evidence for a Saccadic Range Effect for Visually Guided and Memory-Guided Saccades in Simple Saccade-Targeting Tasks.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Françoise Vitu; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.