Literature DB >> 17184806

The IOVP effect in mindless reading: experiment and modeling.

Antje Nuthmann1, Ralf Engbert, Reinhold Kliegl.   

Abstract

Fixation durations in reading are longer for within-word fixation positions close to word center than for positions near word boundaries. This counterintuitive result was termed the Inverted-Optimal Viewing Position (IOVP) effect. We proposed an explanation of the effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations [Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217], that suggests that the IOVP effect is not related to word processing. Here we demonstrate the existence of an IOVP effect in "mindless reading", a z-string scanning task. We compare the results from experimental data with results obtained from computer simulations of a simple model of the IOVP effect and discuss alternative accounts. We conclude that oculomotor errors, which often induce mislocalized fixations, represent the most important source of the IOVP effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17184806     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

3.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

4.  Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-20

5.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Erik D Reichle; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.

Authors:  Jessica E Goold; Wonil Choi; John M Henderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John E Richards
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10

9.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

10.  Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.