Literature DB >> 23054913

Mutational effects depend on ploidy level: all else is not equal.

Aleeza C Gerstein1.   

Abstract

Ploidy is predicted to influence adaptation directly, yet whether single mutations behave the same in different ploidy backgrounds has not been well studied. It has often been assumed theoretically that aside from dominance, selective parameters do not differ between cells of varying ploidy. Using the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, I compared the effect size of 20 adaptive mutations in haploids and homozygous diploids and found, surprisingly, that the same mutations often had a much larger effect in haploids than homozygous diploids. This empirical result demonstrates that it cannot be assumed that mutations will have the same effect in haploids and homozygous diploids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054913      PMCID: PMC3565481          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  15 in total

1.  The relationship between enzyme activity, cell geometry, and fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R L Weiss; J R Kukora; J Adams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An evolutionary advantage of haploidy in large yeast populations.

Authors:  Clifford Zeyl; Thomas Vanderford; Michele Carter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Recombination and the evolution of diploidy.

Authors:  S P Otto; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation?

Authors:  H A Orr; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations.

Authors:  C Paquin; J Adams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Parallel genetic changes and nonparallel gene-environment interactions characterize the evolution of drug resistance in yeast.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Dara S Lo; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Unpredictable fitness transitions between haploid and diploid strains of the genetically loaded yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Significant competitive advantage conferred by meiosis and syngamy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Birdsell; C Wills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Krzysztof Szafraniec; Dominika M Wloch; Piotr Sliwa; Rhona H Borts; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  14 in total

1.  Ploidy tug-of-war: Evolutionary and genetic environments influence the rate of ploidy drive in a human fungal pathogen.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Heekyung Lim; Judith Berman; Meleah A Hickman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Estimating the Fitness Effect of Deleterious Mutations During the Two Phases of the Life Cycle: A New Method Applied to the Root-Rot Fungus Heterobasidion parviporum.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri Clergeot; Nicolas O Rode; Sylvain Glémin; Mikael Brandström Durling; Katarina Ihrmark; Åke Olson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  As it happens: current directions in experimental evolution.

Authors:  Thomas Bataillon; Paul Joyce; Paul Sniegowski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution.

Authors:  Robert T Todd; Anja Forche; Anna Selmecki
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Frequent ploidy changes in growing yeast cultures.

Authors:  Yaniv Harari; Yoav Ram; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 6.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 7.  Shift and adapt: the costs and benefits of karyotype variations.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Judith Berman
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  The genome-wide rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations differ between haploid and diploid yeast.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Linnea Sandell; Christopher G James; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states.

Authors:  Enikö Zörgö; Karolina Chwialkowska; Arne B Gjuvsland; Elena Garré; Per Sunnerhagen; Gianni Liti; Anders Blomberg; Stig W Omholt; Jonas Warringer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The conditional nature of genetic interactions: the consequences of wild-type backgrounds on mutational interactions in a genome-wide modifier screen.

Authors:  Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.