Literature DB >> 2034273

Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

A S Kondrashov1, J F Crow.   

Abstract

Although the evolutionary advantages of sexual reproduction have been extensively discussed, much less attention has been paid to haploid and diploid phases of the sexual life cycle. The relative lengths of these phases differ greatly in various taxa, including as extremes those with one or the other phase reduced to a single cell. Here we consider the efficiency of elimination of deleterious mutations as an evolutionary force and compare the mutation loads under haploid and diploid selection, Ln and L2n. With truncation-like selection, partial dominance, and heterozygous effect of a mutation less than about 1/4 its hemizygous effect, L2n less than Ln; otherwise L2n greater than Ln. The difference becomes important when the genomic deleterious mutation rate exceeds about 1 per genome. This suggests that the mutation rate, degree of dominance and mode of selection can be important in life-cycle evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2034273     DOI: 10.1038/351314a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  68 in total

Review 1.  The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  T Vellai; G Vida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution.

Authors:  Arthur L Beaudet; Yong-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation.

Authors:  D W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Origin of sex revisited.

Authors:  Mauro Santos; Elias Zintzaras; Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  Molecular basis of adaptive convergence in experimental populations of RNA viruses.

Authors:  José M Cuevas; Santiago F Elena; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Heterozygote advantage and the evolution of a dominant diploid phase.

Authors:  D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Haploidy, diploidy and evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James B Anderson; Caroline Sirjusingh; Nicole Ricker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Co-infection weakens selection against epistatic mutations in RNA viruses.

Authors:  Rémy Froissart; Claus O Wilke; Rebecca Montville; Susanna K Remold; Lin Chao; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genotype-environment interactions of spontaneous mutations for vegetative fitness in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Jianping Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.