Literature DB >> 22995744

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: Part II.

John D Biglands1, Aleksandra Radjenovic, John P Ridgway.   

Abstract

This is the second of two reviews that is intended to cover the essential aspects of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) physics in a way that is understandable and relevant to clinicians using CMR in their daily practice. Starting with the basic pulse sequences and contrast mechanisms described in part I, it briefly discusses further approaches to accelerate image acquisition. It then continues by showing in detail how the contrast behaviour of black blood fast spin echo and bright blood cine gradient echo techniques can be modified by adding rf preparation pulses to derive a number of more specialised pulse sequences. The simplest examples described include T2-weighted oedema imaging, fat suppression and myocardial tagging cine pulse sequences. Two further important derivatives of the gradient echo pulse sequence, obtained by adding preparation pulses, are used in combination with the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent for myocardial perfusion imaging and the assessment of myocardial tissue viability using a late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique. These two imaging techniques are discussed in more detail, outlining the basic principles of each pulse sequence, the practical steps required to achieve the best results in a clinical setting and, in the case of perfusion, explaining some of the factors that influence current approaches to perfusion image analysis. The key principles of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) are also explained in detail, especially focusing on timing of the acquisition following contrast agent bolus administration, and current approaches to achieving time resolved MRA. Alternative MRA techniques that do not require the use of an endogenous contrast agent are summarised, and the specialised pulse sequence used to image the coronary arteries, using respiratory navigator gating, is described in detail. The article concludes by explaining the principle behind phase contrast imaging techniques which create images that represent the phase of the MR signal rather than the magnitude. It is shown how this principle can be used to generate velocity maps by designing gradient waveforms that give rise to a relative phase change that is proportional to velocity. Choice of velocity encoding range and key pitfalls in the use of this technique are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995744      PMCID: PMC3533879          DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  93 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation.

Authors:  Joachim Lotz; Christian Meier; Andreas Leppert; Michael Galanski
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Band artifacts due to bulk motion.

Authors:  Pippa Storey; Qun Chen; Wei Li; Robert R Edelman; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Fast, three-dimensional free-breathing MR imaging of myocardial infarction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Manojkumar Saranathan; Carlos E Rochitte; Thomas K F Foo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Prebolus quantitative MR heart perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Herbert Köstler; Christian Ritter; Michael Lipp; Meinrad Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Jörn Sandstede
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison of hybrid echo-planar imaging and FLASH myocardial perfusion cardiovascular MR imaging.

Authors:  Andrew G Elkington; Peter D Gatehouse; Timothy M Cannell; James C Moon; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion --a review.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath-hold three-dimensional gradient echo imaging.

Authors:  A H Wilman; S J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Heart wall motion: improved method of spatial modulation of magnetization for MR imaging.

Authors:  L Axel; L Dougherty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cine MR imaging of valvular heart disease: display and imaging parameters affect the size of the signal void caused by valvular regurgitation.

Authors:  J Suzuki; G R Caputo; C Kondo; C B Higgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Benjamin Cheong; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

Review 2.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Giulia d'Amati; Ornella Rimoldi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance as an early non-invasive biomarker for cardiotoxicity in cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Matthew K Burrage; Vanessa M Ferreira
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-06

Review 4.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Structure-Function Relationships in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.179

5.  A radial sampling strategy for uniform k-space coverage with retrospective respiratory gating in 3D ultrashort-echo-time lung imaging.

Authors:  Jinil Park; Taehoon Shin; Soon Ho Yoon; Jin Mo Goo; Jang-Yeon Park
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using view-sharing from two different vendors versus single arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Won Jae Lee; Soohyun Ahn; Na Young Hwang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A Customizable Multimodality Imaging Compound That Relates External Landmarks to Internal Structures.

Authors:  Mulugeta Semework
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 8.  4D flow MRI applications in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Judy Rizk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Multimodality imaging for the quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Pei G Chew; Katrina Bounford; Sven Plein; Dominik Schlosshan; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-04

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Diagnostic utility and specific considerations in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Frances M Mitchell; Sanjay K Prasad; Gerald F Greil; Peter Drivas; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Claire E Raphael
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.