Literature DB >> 24834409

Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Ramkumar Krishnamurthy1, Benjamin Cheong1, Raja Muthupillai1.   

Abstract

In less than fifteen years, as a non-invasive imaging option, cardiovascular MR has grown from a being a mere curiosity to becoming a widely used clinical tool for evaluating cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is now routinely used to study myocardial structure, cardiac function, macro vascular blood flow, myocardial perfusion, and myocardial viability. For someone entering the field of cardiac MR, this rapid pace of development in the field of CMRI might make it difficult to identify a cohesive starting point. In this brief review, we have attempted to summarize the key cardiovascular imaging techniques that have found widespread clinical acceptance. In particular, we describe the essential cardiac and respiratory gating techniques that form the backbone of all cardiovascular imaging methods. It is followed by four sections that discuss: (I) the gradient echo techniques that are used to assess ventricular function; (II) black-blood turbo spin echo (SE) methods used for morphologic assessment of the heart; (III) phase-contrast based techniques for the assessment of blood flow; and (IV) CMR methods for the assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability. In each section, we briefly summarize technical considerations relevant to the clinical use of these techniques, followed by practical information for its clinical implementation. In each of those four areas, CMRI is considered either as the benchmark imaging modality against which the diagnostic performance of other imaging modalities are compared against, or provides a complementary capability to existing imaging techniques. We have deliberately avoided including cutting-edge CMR imaging techniques practiced at few academic centers, and restricted our discussion to methods that are widely used and are likely to be available in a clinical setting. Our hope is that this review would propel an interested reader toward more comprehensive reviews in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI); cardiac functional imaging; myocardial ischemia imaging; myocardial structural imaging; myocardial viability imaging

Year:  2014        PMID: 24834409      PMCID: PMC3996229          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  101 in total

1.  Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk--a risky business?

Authors:  W Benjamin Wince; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques.

Authors:  A P Yoganathan; E G Cape; H W Sung; F P Williams; A Jimoh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Y Wang; E Vidan; G W Bergman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Multi-shot EPI for improvement of myocardial tag contrast: comparison with segmented SPGR.

Authors:  C Tang; E R McVeigh; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Very fast MR imaging by field echoes and small angle excitation.

Authors:  P van der Meulen; J P Groen; J J Cuppen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Christine Mancini; Elliot R McVeigh; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography.

Authors:  A C Van Rossum; F C Visser; M Sprenger; M J Van Eenige; J Valk; J P Roos
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart using image planes oriented to cardiac axes: experience with 100 cases.

Authors:  R E Dinsmore; G L Wismer; S W Miller; R Thompson; D L Johnston; P Liu; R D Okada; S Saini; T J Brady
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  11 in total

1.  3-D cardiac MRI in free-breathing newborns and infants: when is respiratory gating necessary?

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Patrick Krumm; Andreas Hornung; Jürgen F Schäfer; Ulrich Kramer; Ludger Sieverding
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23

2.  Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients With Turbulent Aortic Flow.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lee; Blair Richards; Jimmy C Lu; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Adam L Dorfman; Sowmya Balasubramanian; Prachi P Agarwal
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Assessment of methodologies to calculate intraventricular pressure differences in computational models and patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Londono-Hoyos; Abigail Swillens; Joris Van Cauwenberge; Brett Meyers; Maheswara Reddy Koppula; Pavlos Vlachos; Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Real-time MRI guidance of cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Mohammad A Tavallaei; Mihaela Pop; Elena K Grant; Henry Chubb; Kawal Rhode; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children.

Authors:  Keyur Parekh; Michael Markl; Michael Rose; Susanne Schnell; Andrada Popescu; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Temporally resolved parametric assessment of Z-magnetization recovery (TOPAZ): Dynamic myocardial T1 mapping using a cine steady-state look-locker approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Chetan Shenoy; Benedikt Rieger; Lothar R Schad; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Diagnostic utility and specific considerations in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Frances M Mitchell; Sanjay K Prasad; Gerald F Greil; Peter Drivas; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Claire E Raphael
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-08

8.  Guidelines for measuring cardiac physiology in mice.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Zamaneh Kassiri; Jitka A I Virag; Lisandra E de Castro Brás; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).

Authors:  Giacomo Annio; Ryo Torii; Andrea Ducci; Vivek Muthurangu; Victor Tsang; Gaetano Burriesci
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Nicoletta Del Papa; Francesca Pignataro; Eleonora Zaccara; Wanda Maglione; Antonina Minniti
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.