Literature DB >> 16812530

Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

B Alsop, D Elliffe.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained to respond on two keys, each of which provided reinforcers on an arithmetic variable-interval schedule. These concurrent schedules ran nonindependently with a 2-s changeover delay. Six sets of conditions were conducted. Within each set of conditions the ratio of reinforcers available on the two alternatives was varied, but the arranged overall reinforcer rate remained constant. Each set of conditions used a different overall reinforcer rate, ranging from 0.22 reinforcers per minute to 10 reinforcers per minute. The generalized matching law fit the data from each set of conditions, but sensitivity to reinforcer frequency (a) decreased as the overall reinforcer rate decreased for both time allocation and response allocation based analyses of the data. Overall response rates did not vary with changes in relative reinforcer rate, but decreased with decreases in overall reinforcer rate. Changeover rates varied as a function of both relative and overall reinforcer rates. However, as explanations based on changeover rate seem unable to deal with the changes in generalized matching sensitivity, discrimination accounts of choice may offer a more promising interpretation.

Year:  1988        PMID: 16812530      PMCID: PMC1338824          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The assumptions underlying the generalized matching law.

Authors:  D Prelec
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching and overmatching as deviations from the matching law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, statistics, and common sense.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  47 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Landon; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.

Authors:  M Davison; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conjoint schedules of timeout deletion in pigeons.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy.

Authors:  K G White; B Alsop; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.