OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. METHODS: Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. RESULTS: Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. METHODS: Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. RESULTS: Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.
Authors: Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Kristin Jensen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen; Anders Tingberg; Trond Mogens Aaløkken; Erik Fosse Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Gabriel; L J Eckel; D R DeLone; K N Krecke; P H Luetmer; C H McCollough; J G Fletcher; L Yu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: G Jay Hanson; Gregory J Michalak; Robert Childs; Brian McCollough; Anil N Kurup; David M Hough; Judson M Frye; Jeff L Fidler; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Ahmed F Halaweish; W Scott Harmsen; Cynthia H McCollough; J G Fletcher Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2018-06