Literature DB >> 27935766

Dual-Source Single-Energy Multidetector CT Used to Obtain Multiple Radiation Exposure Levels within the Same Patient: Phantom Development and Clinical Validation.

Davide Bellini1, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo1, Alex Bibbey1, Justin Solomon1, Lynne M Hurwitz1, Alfredo Farjat1, Achille Mileto1, Ehsan Samei1, Daniele Marin1.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop, in a phantom environment, a method to obtain multidetector computed tomographic (CT) data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient and to validate its use for potential dose reduction by using different image reconstruction algorithms for the detection of liver metastases. Materials and Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using a dual-source multidetector CT platform. By adjusting the radiation output of each tube, data sets at six radiation exposure levels (100%, 75%, 50%, 37.5%, 25%, and 12.5%) were reconstructed from two consecutive dual-source single-energy (DSSE) acquisitions, as well as a conventional single-source acquisition. A prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed by using the same DSSE strategy in 19 patients who underwent multidetector CT of the liver for metastatic colorectal cancer. All images were reconstructed by using conventional weighted filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction with strength level of 3 (SAFIRE-3). Objective image quality metrics were compared in the phantom experiment by using multiple linear regression analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze image quality metrics and diagnostic performance for lesion detection by readers. Results The phantom experiment showed comparable image quality between DSSE and conventional single-source acquisition. In the patient study, the mean size-specific dose estimates for the six radiation exposure levels were 13.0, 9.8, 5.8, 4.4, 3.2, and 1.4 mGy. For each radiation exposure level, readers' perception of image quality and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE-3 when compared with FBP (P ≤ .05 for all comparisons). Reduction of up to 62.5% in radiation exposure by using SAFIRE-3 yielded similar reader rankings of image quality and lesion conspicuity when compared with routine-dose FBP. Conclusion A method was developed and validated to synthesize multidetector CT data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient. This technique may provide a foundation for future clinical trials aimed at estimating potential radiation dose reduction by using iterative reconstructions. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27935766      PMCID: PMC5410972          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.

Authors:  Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Synho Do; Jean Baptiste Thibault; Homer Pien; Owen J O'Connor; Owen O J Connor; Michael A Blake
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Bias in research studies.

Authors:  Gregory T Sica
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Mischa Woisetschläger; Nils Dahlström; Sarabjeet Singh; Maria Lindblom; Garry Choy; Petter Quick; Bernhard Schmidt; Martin Sedlmair; Michael A Blake; Anders Persson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Junfeng Wang; W Annefloor van Enst; Mariska M Leeflang; Lotty Hooft; Nynke Smidt; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Nancy A Obuchowski; David Einstein; Namita Gandhi; Brian R Herts; Andrei Purysko; Erick Remer; Neil Vachhani; Neil Vachani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study.

Authors:  Ajit H Goenka; Brian R Herts; Nancy A Obuchowski; Andrew N Primak; Frank Dong; Wadih Karim; Mark E Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Lifeng Yu; Zhoubo Li; Armando Manduca; Daniel J Blezek; David M Hough; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Gregory C Brickner; Joseph C Cernigliaro; Amy K Hara; Jeff L Fidler; David S Lake; Maria Shiung; David Lewis; Shuai Leng; Kurt E Augustine; Rickey E Carter; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Enterography for Active Inflammatory Terminal Ileal Crohn Disease: Comparison of Full-Dose and Half-Dose Images Reconstructed with FBP and Half-Dose Images with SAFIRE.

Authors:  Namita S Gandhi; Mark E Baker; Ajit H Goenka; Jennifer A Bullen; Nancy A Obuchowski; Erick M Remer; Christopher P Coppa; David Einstein; Myra K Feldman; Devaraju Kanmaniraja; Andrei S Purysko; Noushin Vahdat; Andrew N Primak; Wadih Karim; Brian R Herts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Submillisievert chest dual energy computed tomography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rodrigo Canellas; Jeanne B Ackman; Subba R Digumarthy; Melissa Price; Alexi Otrakji; Shaunagh McDermott; Amita Sharma; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Shota Tanoue; Akinori Tsuji; Joji Urata; Mitsuhiro Furusawa; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Eri Yoshida; Morikatsu Yoshida; Masafumi Kidoh; Machiko Tateishi; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?

Authors:  Joel Aissa; Edwin Bölke; Lino M Sawicki; Elisabeth Appel; Christoph Thomas; Philipp Heusch; Martin Sedlmair; Karl Krzymyk; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Johannes Boos
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction in thoracoabdominal CT, using Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) technique in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Michael Scharf; Stephanie Brendel; Katja Melzer; Christian Hentschke; Matthias May; Michael Uder; Michael M Lell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.