Literature DB >> 25920857

Amplitude fluctuations in a masker influence lexical segmentation in cochlear implant users.

Trevor T Perry1, Bomjun J Kwon1.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing listeners show masking release, or better speech understanding in a fluctuating-amplitude masker than in a steady-amplitude masker, but most cochlear implant (CI) users consistently show little or no masking release even in artificial conditions where masking release is highly anticipated. The current study examined the hypothesis that the reduced or absent masking release in CI users is due to disruption of linguistic segmentation cues. Eleven CI subjects completed a sentence keyword identification task in a steady masker and a fluctuating masker with dips timed to increase speech availability. Lexical boundary errors in their responses were categorized as consistent or inconsistent with the use of the metrical segmentation strategy (MSS). Subjects who demonstrated masking release showed greater adherence to the MSS in the fluctuating masker compared to subjects who showed little or no masking release, while both groups used metrical segmentation cues similarly in the steady masker. Based on the characteristics of the segmentation cues, the results are interpreted as evidence that CI listeners showing little or no masking release are not reliably segregating speech from competing sounds, further suggesting that one challenge faced by CI users listening in noisy environments is a reduction of reliable segmentation cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920857      PMCID: PMC4417024          DOI: 10.1121/1.4916698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Woodfield; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: a study of resynthesized speech.

Authors:  Stephanie M Spitzer; Julie M Liss; Sven L Mattys
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Joanna Brooks; Martin Cooke
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Yingjiu Nie; Peggy Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  David Morris; Lennart Magnusson; Andrew Faulkner; Radoslava Jönsson; Holger Juul
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.

Authors:  Claus Christiansen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.