Literature DB >> 29576729

Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound.

Joshua N Pritikin1, Lance M Rappaport1, Michael C Neale1.   

Abstract

The precision of estimates in many statistical models can be expressed by a confidence interval (CI). CIs based on standard errors (SE) are common in practice, but likelihood-based CIs are worth consideration. In comparison to SEs, likelihood-based CIs are typically more difficult to estimate, but are more robust to model (re)parameterization. In latent variable models, some parameters may take on values outside of their interpretable range. Therefore, it is desirable to place a bound to keep the parameter interpretable. For likelihood-based CI, a correction is needed when a parameter is bounded. The correction is known (Wu & Neale, 2012), but is difficult to implement in practice. A novel automatic implementation that is simple for an applied researcher to use is introduced. A simulation study demonstrates the accuracy of the correction using a latent growth curve model and the method is illustrated with a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wald test; Wilks test; confidence intervals; likelihood ratio test

Year:  2017        PMID: 29576729      PMCID: PMC5863926          DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1275969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling        ISSN: 1070-5511            Impact factor:   6.125


  8 in total

1.  Random intercept item factor analysis.

Authors:  Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-12

2.  MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND COMPUTER ALGEBRA.

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2010-10-07

3.  The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models.

Authors:  M C Neale; M B Miller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Fitting genetic models with LISREL: hypothesis testing.

Authors:  M C Neale; A C Heath; J K Hewitt; L J Eaves; D W Fulker
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Michael D Hunter; Joshua N Pritikin; Mahsa Zahery; Timothy R Brick; Robert M Kirkpatrick; Ryne Estabrook; Timothy C Bates; Hermine H Maes; Steven M Boker
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  The independence of positive and negative affect.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-11

7.  Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.500

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Model Fit Estimation for Multilevel Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Lance M Rappaport; Ananda B Amstadter; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.125

2.  A Population-Based Twin Study of Childhood Irritability and Internalizing Syndromes.

Authors:  Lance M Rappaport; Dever M Carney; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Roxann Roberson-Nay; John M Hettema
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  Strong Genetic Effects on Bone Mineral Density in Multiple Locations with Two Different Techniques: Results from a Cross-Sectional Twin Study.

Authors:  Marton Piroska; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Helga Szabo; Zsofia Jokkel; Szilvia Meszaros; Csaba Horvath; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.