Literature DB >> 25106394

On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.

Hao Wu1, Michael C Neale.   

Abstract

The ACE and ADE models have been heavily exploited in twin studies to identify the genetic and environmental components in phenotypes. However, the validity of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) of the existence of a variance component, a key step in the use of such models, has been doubted because the true values of the parameters lie on the boundary of the parameter space of the alternative model for such tests, violating a regularity condition required for a LRT (e.g., Carey in Behav. Genet. 35:653-665, 2005; Visscher in Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9:490-495, 2006). Dominicus, Skrondal, Gjessing, Pedersen, and Palmgren (Behav. Genet. 36:331-340, 2006) solve the problem of testing univariate components in ACDE models. Our current work as presented in this paper resolves the issue of LRTs in bivariate ACDE models by exploiting the theoretical frameworks of inequality constrained LRTs based on cone approximations. Our derivation shows that the asymptotic sampling distribution of the test statistic for testing a single bivariate component in an ACE or ADE model is a mixture of χ (2) distributions of degrees of freedom (dfs) ranging from 0 to 3, and that for testing both the A and C (or D) components is one of dfs ranging from 0 to 6. These correct distributions are stochastically smaller than the χ (2) distributions in traditional LRTs and therefore LRTs based on these distributions are more powerful than those used naively. Formulas for calculating the weights are derived and the sampling distributions are confirmed by simulation studies. Several invariance properties for normal data (at most) missing by person are also proved. Potential generalizations of this work are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 25106394      PMCID: PMC4129549          DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9304-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  7 in total

1.  Cholesky problems.

Authors:  Gregory Carey
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Annica Dominicus; Anders Skrondal; Håkon K Gjessing; Nancy L Pedersen; Juni Palmgren
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy.

Authors:  Summer S Han; Joseph T Chang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.

Authors:  D O Stram; J W Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Univariate genetic analysis of blood pressure in children (the Medical College of Virginia Twin Study).

Authors:  R M Schieken; L J Eaves; J K Hewitt; M Mosteller; J N Bodurtha; W B Moskowitz; W E Nance
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Does degree of gyrification underlie the phenotypic and genetic associations between cortical surface area and cognitive ability?

Authors:  Anna R Docherty; Donald J Hagler; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael C Neale; Lisa T Eyler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Carol E Franz; Amy Jak; Michael J Lyons; Daniel A Rinker; Wesley K Thompson; Ming T Tsuang; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Ryne Estabrook
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A Note on the Identifiability of Fixed-Effect 3PL Models.

Authors:  Hao Wu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  The Boulder Workshop Question Box.

Authors:  David M Evans
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound.

Authors:  Joshua N Pritikin; Lance M Rappaport; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 6.125

6.  Genetic underpinnings of callous-unemotional traits and emotion recognition in children, adolescents, and emerging adults.

Authors:  Ashlee A Moore; Lance M Rappaport; R James Blair; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman; John M Hettema; Roxann Roberson-Nay
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  A Developmental Twin Study of Emotion Recognition and Its Negative Affective Clinical Correlates.

Authors:  Lance M Rappaport; Dever M Carney; Brad Verhulst; Michael C Neale; James Blair; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; John M Hettema; Roxann Roberson-Nay
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  Genetic relationship between the addiction diagnosis in adults and their childhood measure of addiction liability.

Authors:  Michael Vanyukov; Kevin Kim; Daniel Irons; Levent Kirisci; Michael Neale; Ty Ridenour; Brian Hicks; Ralph Tarter; Maureen Reynolds; Galina Kirillova; Matt McGue; William Iacono
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Age-Related Differences in the Structure of Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Types of Peer Victimization.

Authors:  Meridith L Eastman; Brad Verhulst; Lance M Rappaport; Melanie Dirks; Chelsea Sawyers; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman; John M Hettema; Roxann Roberson-Nay
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.