Literature DB >> 16899155

A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components.

Peter M Visscher1.   

Abstract

When using maximum likelihood methods to estimate genetic and environmental components of (co)variance, it is common to test hypotheses using likelihood ratio tests, since such tests have desirable asymptotic properties. In particular, the standard likelihood ratio test statistic is assumed asymptotically to follow a chi2 distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the number of parameters tested. Using the relationship between least squares and maximum likelihood estimators for balanced designs, it is shown why the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio test for variance components does not follow a chi2 distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the number of parameters tested when the null hypothesis is true. Instead, the distribution of the likelihood ratio test is a mixture of chi2 distributions with different degrees of freedom. Implications for testing variance components in twin designs and for quantitative trait loci mapping are discussed. The appropriate distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic should be used in hypothesis testing and model selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899155     DOI: 10.1375/183242706778024928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  58 in total

1.  A Random-Model Approach to QTL Mapping in Multiparent Advanced Generation Intercross (MAGIC) Populations.

Authors:  Julong Wei; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-wide meta-analyses of stratified depression in Generation Scotland and UK Biobank.

Authors:  Lynsey S Hall; Mark J Adams; Aleix Arnau-Soler; Toni-Kim Clarke; David M Howard; Yanni Zeng; Gail Davies; Saskia P Hagenaars; Ana Maria Fernandez-Pujals; Jude Gibson; Eleanor M Wigmore; Thibaud S Boutin; Caroline Hayward; Generation Scotland; David J Porteous; Ian J Deary; Pippa A Thomson; Chris S Haley; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Power of the classical twin design revisited: II detection of common environmental variance.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Scott Gordon; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Elizabeth Prom-Wormley; Matthew Keller; Sarah Medland; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker.

Authors:  Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Zulma G Vitezica; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal; Rodolfo J C Cantet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Power and Effective Study Size in Heritability Studies.

Authors:  Jesse D Raffa; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2016-02-08

7.  Inheritance of nesting behaviour across natural environmental variation in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Lisa E Schwanz; Rachel M Bowden; Julie E Gonzalez; Fredric J Janzen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Efficient calculation of empirical P-values for genome-wide linkage analysis through weighted permutation.

Authors:  Sarah E Medland; James E Schmitt; Bradley T Webb; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Extensive QTL and association analyses of the QTLMAS2009 Data.

Authors:  Georgia Hadjipavlou; Gib Hemani; Richard Leach; Bruno Louro; Javad Nadaf; Suzanne Rowe; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2010-03-31

10.  Detection of multiple quantitative trait loci and their pleiotropic effects in outbred pig populations.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Nagamine; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Peter M Visscher; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.