Literature DB >> 30569348

Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.

Brad Verhulst1, Elizabeth Prom-Wormley2, Matthew Keller3, Sarah Medland4, Michael C Neale5.   

Abstract

For many multivariate twin models, the numerical Type I error rates are lower than theoretically expected rates using a likelihood ratio test (LRT), which implies that the significance threshold for statistical hypothesis tests is more conservative than most twin researchers realize. This makes the numerical Type II error rates higher than theoretically expected. Furthermore, the discrepancy between the observed and expected error rates increases as more variables are included in the analysis and can have profound implications for hypothesis testing and statistical inference. In two simulation studies, we examine the Type I error rates for the Cholesky decomposition and Correlated Factors models. Both show markedly lower than nominal Type I error rates under the null hypothesis, a discrepancy that increases with the number of variables in the model. In addition, we observe slightly biased parameter estimates for the Cholesky decomposition and Correlated Factors models. By contrast, if the variance-covariance matrices for variance components are estimated directly (without constraints), the numerical Type I error rates are consistent with theoretical expectations and there is no bias in the parameter estimates regardless of the number of variables analyzed. We call this the direct symmetric approach. It appears that each model-implied boundary, whether explicit or implicit, increases the discrepancy between the numerical and theoretical Type I error rates by truncating the sampling distributions of the variance components and inducing bias in the parameters. The direct symmetric approach has several advantages over other multivariate twin models as it corrects the Type I error rate and parameter bias issues, is easy to implement in current software, and has fewer optimization problems. Implications for past and future research, and potential limitations associated with direct estimation of genetic and environmental covariance matrices are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholesky decomposition; Correlated factors model; Direct symmetrical matrix; Twin models; Type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30569348      PMCID: PMC6345547          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-018-9942-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of analyses of univariate discrete twin data.

Authors:  Patrick F Sullivan; Lindon J Eaves
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Estimating the extent of parameter bias in the classical twin design: a comparison of parameter estimates from extended twin-family and classical twin designs.

Authors:  William L Coventry; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 4.  Multivariate genetic analysis of sex limitation and G x E interaction.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Espen Røysamb; Kristen Jacobson
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Annica Dominicus; Anders Skrondal; Håkon K Gjessing; Nancy L Pedersen; Juni Palmgren
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  The genetical analysis of covariance structure.

Authors:  N G Martin; L J Eaves
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Michael D Hunter; Joshua N Pritikin; Mahsa Zahery; Timothy R Brick; Robert M Kirkpatrick; Ryne Estabrook; Timothy C Bates; Hermine H Maes; Steven M Boker
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.

Authors:  J Rice; C R Cloninger; T Reich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The negative heritability of neonatal jaundice.

Authors:  J B Haldane
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; A Mesut Erzurumluoglu; Benjamin L Elsworth; John P Kemp; Laurence Howe; Philip C Haycock; Gibran Hemani; Katherine Tansey; Charles Laurin; Beate St Pourcain; Nicole M Warrington; Hilary K Finucane; Alkes L Price; Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Verneri Anttila; Lavinia Paternoster; Tom R Gaunt; David M Evans; Benjamin M Neale
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  15 in total

1.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  The Boulder Workshop Question Box.

Authors:  David M Evans
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Genetic and environmental risk factors in the non-medical use of over-the-counter or prescribed analgesics, and their relationship to major classes of licit and illicit substance use and misuse in a population-based sample of young adult twins.

Authors:  Nathan A Gillespie; Timothy C Bates; Ian B Hickie; Sarah E Medland; Brad Verhulst; Robert M Kirkpatrick; Kenneth S Kendler; Nicholas G Martin; Eric G Benotsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Biological Essentialism, Heuristic Thinking, Need for Closure, and Conservative Values: Insights From a Survey and Twin Study.

Authors:  J J Morosoli; F K Barlow; L Colodro-Conde; S E Medland
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Heritability of Urinary Amines, Organic Acids, and Steroid Hormones in Children.

Authors:  Fiona A Hagenbeek; Jenny van Dongen; René Pool; Amy C Harms; Peter J Roetman; Vassilios Fanos; Britt J van Keulen; Brian R Walker; Naama Karu; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Joost Rotteveel; Martijn J J Finken; Robert R J M Vermeiren; Cornelis Kluft; Meike Bartels; Thomas Hankemeier; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  Genetic associations between executive functions and intelligence: A combined twin and adoption study.

Authors:  Daniel E Gustavson; Chandra A Reynolds; Robin P Corley; Sally J Wadsworth; John K Hewitt; Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  The Moderating Influence of School Achievement on Intelligence in Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Emilie Rune Hegelund; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Trine Flensborg-Madsen; Jesper Dammeyer; Kaare Christensen; Wendy Johnson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Best Practices for Binary and Ordinal Data Analyses.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Genetic Influences on the Covariance and Genetic Correlations in a Bivariate Twin Model: An Application to Well-Being.

Authors:  Lianne P de Vries; Toos C E M van Beijsterveldt; Hermine Maes; Lucía Colodro-Conde; Meike Bartels
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Measuring heritable contributions to Alzheimer's disease: polygenic risk score analysis with twins.

Authors:  Ida K Karlsson; Valentina Escott-Price; Margaret Gatz; John Hardy; Nancy L Pedersen; Maryam Shoai; Chandra A Reynolds
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.