Literature DB >> 22956826

Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect.

Francesca Perini1, Luigi Cattaneo, Marisa Carrasco, Jens V Schwarzbach.   

Abstract

The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain state at the stimulation moment. Four mechanisms have been proposed to underlie these effects: (1) virtual lesion--TMS suppresses neural signals; (2) preferential activation of less active neurons--TMS drives up activity in the stimulated area, but active neurons are saturating; (3) noise generation--TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect interacts with stimulus intensity; and (4) noise generation--TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect depends on TMS intensity. Here we explore these hypotheses by investigating the effects of TMS on early visual cortex by assessing the contrast response function while varying the adaptation state of the observers. We tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent upon contrast sensitivity. Before each trial, neuronal activation of visual cortex was altered through contrast adaptation to two flickering gratings. In a factorial design, with or without adaptation, a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with targets of varying contrast. Adaptation decreased contrast sensitivity. The effect of TMS on performance was state dependent: TMS decreased contrast sensitivity in the absence of adaptation but increased it after adaptation. None of the proposed mechanisms can account for the results in their entirety, in particular, for the facilitatory effect at intermediate to high contrasts after adaptation. We propose an alternative hypothesis: TMS effects are activity dependent, so that TMS suppresses the most active neurons and thereby changes the balance between excitation and inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956826      PMCID: PMC3472806          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-03-13       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation?

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Colin W G Clifford; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Juha Silvanto
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  A population-coding model of attention's influence on contrast response: Estimating neural effects from psychophysical data.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Thielscher; A Reichenbach; K Uğurbil; K Uludağ
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  15 in total

1.  The right temporoparietal junction plays a causal role in maintaining the internal representation of verticality.

Authors:  Francesca Fiori; Matteo Candidi; Adriano Acciarino; Nicole David; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.

Authors:  Takenobu Murakami; Mitsunari Abe; Winnugroho Wiratman; Juri Fujiwara; Masahiro Okamoto; Tomomi Mizuochi-Endo; Toshiki Iwabuchi; Michiru Makuuchi; Akira Yamashita; Amanda Tiksnadi; Fang-Yu Chang; Hitoshi Kubo; Nozomu Matsuda; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Satoshi Eifuku; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Nitzan Censor; Ethan R Buch; Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Emotional processing and rTMS: does inhibitory theta burst stimulation affect the human startle reflex?

Authors:  Nadja Vennewald; Bernward Winter; Karina Limburg; Julia Diemer; Swantje Notzon; Inga Fohrbeck; Volker Arolt; Katharina Domschke; Paul Pauli; Peter Zwanzger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Synchronous and opposite roles of the parietal and prefrontal cortices in bistable perception: a double-coil TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Anna-Katharine Brem; Faranak Farzan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Shining new light on dark percepts: visual sensations induced by TMS.

Authors:  Ramisha Knight; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  How to Test the Association Between Baseline Performance Level and the Modulatory Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Luigi Cattaneo; Giulio Costantini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Attention Reorients Periodically.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Matteo Candidi; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.