Literature DB >> 27177877

Emotional processing and rTMS: does inhibitory theta burst stimulation affect the human startle reflex?

Nadja Vennewald1,2, Bernward Winter3, Karina Limburg4, Julia Diemer5, Swantje Notzon6, Inga Fohrbeck6, Volker Arolt6, Katharina Domschke7, Paul Pauli8, Peter Zwanzger6,5,9.   

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) enables the local and non-invasive modulation of cortical activity and has proved to achieve antidepressant effects. To a lesser extent, rTMS is investigated as a treatment option for anxiety disorders. As the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala represent key components of human emotion regulation, we investigated how prefrontally applied rTMS affects the responsiveness of the subcortical amygdala during a fear-relevant study paradigm to examine potential cortico-limbic effects. Sham-controlled, randomised inhibitory rTMS (continuous theta burst stimulation, TBS) was applied to 102 healthy subjects (female = 54) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Subsequently, the emotion-potentiated (unpleasant, neutral, and pleasant International Affective Picture System pictures) acoustic startle response was investigated. Subjective anxiety ratings (anxiety sensitivity, trait and state anxiety) were considered. Picture category affected the startle magnitude as expected for both TBS intervention groups (highest startle response for unpleasant, lowest for pleasant pictures). However, no modulatory effects of TBS on startle potentiation were discerned. No significant interaction effects of TBS intervention, subjective anxiety ratings, and gender were identified. Interestingly, startle habituation was influenced by TBS intervention on a trend-level, with verum TBS leading to an accelerated habituation. We found no evidence for the hypothesis that prefrontal inhibitory TBS affects the responsiveness of the amygdala during the presentation of emotionally relevant stimuli in healthy subjects. Instead, we found accelerated habituation under verum TBS on a statistical trend-level. Hence, some preliminary hints for modulatory effects of inhibitory TBS on basic learning mechanisms could be found.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic startle response; Emotion regulation; Emotion-potentiated acoustic startle response; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Startle habituation; Theta burst stimulation (TBS)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27177877     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-016-1568-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  58 in total

1.  Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli.

Authors:  Ahmad R Hariri; Venkata S Mattay; Alessandro Tessitore; Francesco Fera; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Inhibitory transcranial magnetic theta burst stimulation attenuates prefrontal cortex oxygenation.

Authors:  Sara V Tupak; Thomas Dresler; Meike Badewien; Tim Hahn; Lena H Ernst; Martin J Herrmann; Jürgen Deckert; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Andreas J Fallgatter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect.

Authors:  Thomas Nyffeler; Dario Cazzoli; Christian W Hess; René M Müri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Gender differences in emotional responses: a psychophysiological study.

Authors:  Marta Bianchin; Alessandro Angrilli
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-11-12

5.  Multilevel impact of the dopamine system on the emotion-potentiated startle reflex.

Authors:  Katharina Domschke; Bernward Winter; Agnieszka Gajewska; Stefan Unterecker; Bodo Warrings; Andrea Dlugos; Swantje Notzon; Kathrin Nienhaus; Falko Markulin; Astrid Gieselmann; Christian Jacob; Martin J Herrmann; Volker Arolt; Andreas Mühlberger; Andreas Reif; Paul Pauli; Jürgen Deckert; Peter Zwanzger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The structural integrity of an amygdala-prefrontal pathway predicts trait anxiety.

Authors:  M Justin Kim; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Anxiolytic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation--an alternative treatment option in anxiety disorders?

Authors:  Peter Zwanzger; A J Fallgatter; M Zavorotnyy; F Padberg
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Neuroanatomical circuits modulating fear and anxiety behaviors.

Authors:  D S Charney
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  2003

Review 9.  Models and mechanisms of anxiety: evidence from startle studies.

Authors:  Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Affect-modulated startle: interactive influence of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and childhood trauma.

Authors:  Benedikt Klauke; Bernward Winter; Agnes Gajewska; Peter Zwanzger; Andreas Reif; Martin J Herrmann; Andrea Dlugos; Bodo Warrings; Christian Jacob; Andreas Mühlberger; Volker Arolt; Paul Pauli; Jürgen Deckert; Katharina Domschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is prepulse modification altered by continuous theta burst stimulation? DAT1 genotype and motor threshold interact on prepulse modification following brain stimulation.

Authors:  S Notzon; N Vennewald; A Gajewska; A L Klahn; J Diemer; B Winter; I Fohrbeck; V Arolt; P Pauli; K Domschke; P Zwanzger
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Mechanistic link between right prefrontal cortical activity and anxious arousal revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Emily M Beydler; Camille Roberts; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Tiffany Lago; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 7.853

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.