Literature DB >> 11934448

Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

E Leslie Cameron1, Joanna C Tai, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of transient covert attention on the psychometric function for contrast sensitivity in an orientation discrimination task when the target was presented alone in the absence of distracters and visual masks. Transient covert attention decreased both the threshold (consistent with a contrast gain mechanism) and, less consistently, the slope of the psychometric function. We assessed performance at 8 equidistant locations (4.5 degrees eccentricity) and found that threshold and slope depended on target location-both were higher on the vertical than the horizontal meridian, particularly directly above fixation. All effects were robust across a range of spatial frequencies, and the visual field asymmetries increased with spatial frequency. Notwithstanding the dependence of the psychometric function on target location, attention improved performance to a similar extent across the visual field.Given that, in this study, we excluded all sources of external noise, and that we showed experimentally that spatial uncertainty cannot explain the present results, we conclude that the observed attentional benefit is consistent with signal enhancement.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934448     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00039-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  97 in total

1.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  The effect of attention on neuronal responses to high and low contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks.

Authors:  KangWoo Lee; Hyunseung Choo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-22

5.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention.

Authors:  Niko A Busch; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes.

Authors:  James R Müller; Marios G Philiastides; William T Newsome
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance.

Authors:  Shiau-Hua Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.