Literature DB >> 32795447

Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Antonio Fernández1, Marisa Carrasco2.   

Abstract

Orienting covert exogenous (involuntary) attention to a target location improves performance in many visual tasks [1, 2]. It is unknown whether early visual cortical areas are necessary for this improvement. To establish a causal link between these areas and attentional modulations, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to briefly alter cortical excitability and determine whether early visual areas mediate the effect of exogenous attention on performance. Observers performed an orientation discrimination task. After a peripheral valid, neutral, or invalid cue, two cortically magnified gratings were presented, one in the stimulated region and the other in the symmetric region in the opposite hemifield. Observers received two successive TMS pulses around their occipital pole while the stimuli were presented. Shortly after, a response cue indicated the grating whose orientation observers had to discriminate. The response cue either matched-target stimulated-or did not match-distractor stimulated-the stimulated side. Grating contrast was varied to measure contrast response functions (CRF) for all combinations of attention and TMS conditions. When the distractor was stimulated, exogenous attention yielded response gain-performance benefits in the valid-cue condition and costs in the invalid-cue condition compared with the neutral condition at the high contrast levels. Crucially, when the target was stimulated, this response gain was eliminated. Therefore, TMS extinguished the effect of exogenous attention. These results establish a causal link between early visual areas and the modulatory effect of exogenous attention on performance.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  TMS; attention; contrast sensitivity; covert exogenous attention; early visual areas; occipital cortex; response gain

Year:  2020        PMID: 32795447      PMCID: PMC7577948          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  61 in total

1.  The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Kammer; S Beck; M Erb; W Grodd
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 4.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

5.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  J Rovamo; V Virsu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; D B Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Attentional enhancement via selection and pooling of early sensory responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and FMRI response in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Behavioural oscillations in visual orientation discrimination reveal distinct modulation rates for both sensitivity and response bias.

Authors:  Huihui Zhang; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Sara Okun; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search.

Authors:  Garance Merholz; Laetitia Grabot; Rufin VanRullen; Laura Dugué
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Different computations underlie overt presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Jasmine Pan; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 5.  To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Nina M Hanning; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.978

6.  Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exogenous attention generalizes location transfer of perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Eye and hand movements disrupt attentional control.

Authors:  Nina Maria Hanning; Luca Wollenberg; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.