Literature DB >> 18052790

The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation?

Justin A Harris1, Colin W G Clifford, Carlo Miniussi.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular tool for mapping perceptual and cognitive processes in the human brain. It uses a magnetic field to stimulate the brain, modifying ongoing activity in neural tissue under the stimulating coil, producing an effect that has been likened to a "virtual lesion." However, research into the functional basis of this effect, essential for the interpretation of findings, lags behind its application. Acutely, TMS may disable neuronal function, thereby interrupting ongoing neural processes. Alternatively, the effects of TMS have been attributed to an injection of "neural noise," consistent with its immediate and effectively random depolarization of neurons. Here we apply an added-noise paradigm to test these alternatives. We delivered TMS to the visual cortex and measured its effect on a simple visual discrimination task, while concurrently manipulating the level of image noise in the visual stimulus itself. TMS increased thresholds overall; and increasing the amount of image noise systematically increased discrimination thresholds. However, these two effects were not independent. Rather, TMS interacted multiplicatively with the image noise, consistent with a reduction in the strength of the visual signal. Indeed, in this paradigm, there was no evidence that TMS independently added noise to the visual process. Thus, our findings indicate that the "virtual lesion" produced by TMS can take the form of a loss of signal strength which may reflect a momentary interruption to ongoing neural processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18052790     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  30 in total

1.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Zaira Cattaneo; Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effect of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation on complexity of EMG signal: fractal analysis.

Authors:  M Cukic; J Oommen; D Mutavdzic; N Jorgovanovic; M Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Stochastic resonance effects reveal the neural mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf; Juha Silvanto; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Combining TMS and EEG to study cognitive function and cortico-cortico interactions.

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Vincent Walsh; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Using EEG to explore how rTMS produces its effects on behavior.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Massihullah Hamidi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect.

Authors:  Francesca Perini; Luigi Cattaneo; Marisa Carrasco; Jens V Schwarzbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.