| Literature DB >> 22945029 |
Hemant Kumar1, Sandeep Vasant More, Sang-Don Han, Jin-Yong Choi, Dong-Kug Choi.
Abstract
Cognitive disorders can be associated with brain trauma, neurodegenerative disease or as a part of physiological aging. Aging in humans is generally associated with deterioration of cognitive performance and, in particular, learning and memory. Different therapeutic approaches are available to treat cognitive impairment during physiological aging and neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders. Traditional herbal medicine and numerous plants, either directly as supplements or indirectly in the form of food, improve brain functions including memory and attention. More than a hundred herbal medicinal plants have been traditionally used for learning and memory improvement, but only a few have been tested in randomized clinical trials. Here, we will enumerate those medicinal plants that show positive effects on various cognitive functions in learning and memory clinical trials. Moreover, besides natural products that show promising effects in clinical trials, we briefly discuss medicinal plants that have promising experimental data or initial clinical data and might have potential to reach a clinical trial in the near future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22945029 PMCID: PMC6268692 DOI: 10.3390/molecules170910503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Molecular structure of galantamine (A), huperzine A (B), bacoside A (C), ginkgolide B (D), and quercetin (E).
Natural bioactive compounds in clinical trials.
| Bioactive Compound/Intervention | Study design | Memory test | Result/Activity | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galantamine | Patients with Mild to moderate AD, R, DB, PC (3 months/n = 386) | CIBIC-plus and ADAS-cog | Improved cognitive function and basic activities of normal living than placebo in AD patients. | [ |
| Galantamine (8, 16 & 24 mg/day) | Patients with Mild to moderate AD, R, DB, PC, M (5-month) | ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus | Benefits the cognitive, functional, and behavioral symptoms of AD as compared with placebo. | [ |
| Galantamine (24 or 32 mg/day) | Patients with Mild to moderate AD, M, DB, (6-month/n = 636) | ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus | Improved cognition and global function, better outcome on CIBIC-plus and ADAS-cog. | [ |
| Galantamine (24 or 32 mg) | Patients with Mild to moderate AD, R, DB, PC blind, parallel group, trial (6-month/n = 653) | ADAS-cog | Better scores on the disability assessment for dementia, slowed the decline of functional ability as well as cognition in subjects with mild to moderate AD as compared with placebo. | [ |
| Galantamine (24 mg/day) | Patients with Vascular dementia, M, DB, (n = 592) | ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus | Therapeutic effect on all key areas of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities with improved activities of daily living and behavioral symptoms were also significantly improved in dementia patients. | [ |
| Galantamine (24 mg/day) | Patient with severe AD, R, DB, PC, blind (n = 207) | SIB and MDS-ADL | Improvement in memory, praxis, and visuospatial ability. | [ |
| Huperzine A (0.2 mg twice daily) | R, DB, PC with AD (n = 28) | MMSE, ADL, HDS and WMI | Improved memory test scores over the individuals receiving the placebo. | [ |
| Huperzine A (0.4 mg daily) | Subjects with benign vascular dementia, and AD (n = 80) | MQ test | Significant improvement in MQ test as compared to control group. | [ |
| Huperzine Alpha (400 μg/day) | Subjects with diagnosis of possible or probable AD (n = 100/12 weeks) | ADL &ADAS-Cog | Remarkably improves the cognition, behavior, ADL, and mood of AD patients as assessed by ADAS-Cog. | [ |
| Huperzine A (200 & 400 μg; twice daily) | Patients with mild to moderate AD, M, R (16 weeks/n = 210) | ADAS-Cog | Huperzine A 400 μg and not at 200 μg has cognitive effect in patients with mild to moderate AD. | [ |
| Huperzine A (0.1 mg twice daily) | Patients with mild to moderate VaD, R, DB ,PC (12 weeks/n = 78) | CDR, MMSE, and ADL | Huperzine A showed significant improvement in cognitive functions of all test. | [ |
| Bacognize® (300mg; twice daily) | Patients with AD, R, DB, PC and M (6 months) | MMSE | Improvement in attention, language, reading, writing & comprehension. | [ |
|
| Healthy individuals, DB, PC (n = 46) | Well-validated neuropsychological tests | Significant improvement in information processing and memory consolidation, & in state anxiety. | [ |
| Healthy individuals, DB, PC (90 days/n = 127) | Neuropsychological testing using the Cognitive Drug Research cognitive assessment system | Improves partial working memory and reduced number of false positives in the rapid visual information processing task. | [ | |
| 65 or older year individuals, R, DB, PC (12weeks/n = 54) | AVLT, DAT, and WAIS | Enhances AVLT delayed word recall memory scores and also improves ability to ignore irrelevant information as assessed by Stroop test. | [ | |
| BT-11 (extracted from roots of
| Healthy elderly individuals, R, DB, PC (n = 28) | CERAD and MMSE | Treatment by BT-11, increased CERAD scores, word list recognition, constructional recall and praxis, and modified Boston naming test. | [ |
| BT-11 | Healthy individuals, R, DB, PC (4 weeks) | K-CVLTSOPT | Improvement in verbal memory and working memory. | [ |
| EGb 761 (240 mg) | Patients with AD and multi-infarct dementia, R, DB, PC (24 weeks/n = 216) | CGI and NAB | Effective in Alzheimer and multi-infarct dementia. | [ |
| EGb 761 (240 mg/day or 160 mg/day) | Patient with AD or VaD or AAMI, R, DB, PC (n = 214/24 weeks) | SKT, CGI and NAI-NAA | EGb 761 is not beneficial for dementia patients. | [ |
| EGb 761 ( | Aged subjects with no history of significant neurocognitive dysfunction (6 weeks) | Stroop Color and Word Test color-naming task | Significantly showed improvement on a task assessing speed of processing abilities. | [ |
| Standardized extract of
| Healthy individuals, DB, PC (14 week/n = 256) | Tests for attention and memory from the Cognitive Drug Research computerized cognitive assessment system | Significantly to improve an Index of Memory Quality, memory, including long-term and working memory. | [ |
| Capsulated aqueous extract of
| Healthy individuals, R, DB, PC (2 months/n = 28) | Computer assisted technique | Cognitive enhancing effect observed. | [ |
| Ginseng (400 mg) | Healthy young volunteer, R, DB, PC, balanced, cross-over (n = 20) | CDR two serial subtraction mental arithmetic tasks | Improvement in the speed and accuracy of memory and attentional tasks. | [ |
| Panax ginseng extract (G115) (400 mg) | Healthy middle aged individuals, DB, PC balanced trail (n = 30) | Cognitive and mood performance test | Improvement speed of attention and tasks associated with episodic memory performance. | [ |
| Cereboost( | Healthy young volunteer, R, DB, PC, crossover trial (n = 32) | Parameters for mood and neurocognitive effect | Improvement working memory performance, reaction time accuracy and calmness. | [ |
| G115 (200 mg & 400 mg) | Healthy young volunteer, R, DB, PC, crossover trail (n = 30) | COGNITIVE BATTERY (Bond-Lader visual analogue scales, Computerised Corsi block tapping task, N-back task and Random number generation task | Modulation of cognitive function and mood. | [ |
| HT100 (proprietary North American ginseng extract) | Individuals with schizophrenia, DB, PC (4 weeks/n = 64) | Letter-Number Span Test and Visual Pattern Test | Significant improvement in visual working memory. | [ |
| LGNC-07 (combination of green tea extract and L-Theanine/1,680 mg) | MCI subjects, DB, PC (16 weeks/n = 91) | Rey–Kim memory test and Stroop color-word test | Significant improvement in selective attention, cognitive alertness, memory and verbal reading. | [ |
| Green Tea | Cross-sectional trial (n = 1003) | MMSE | Higher consumption of green tea lowers prevalence of cognitive impairment. | [ |
| Total Tea | Cross-sectional and longitudinal (n = 2501) | MMSE | Total tea consumption lowers risk of cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. | [ |
| Total Tea | Cross-sectional trial (n = 716) | MMSE | Total tea consumption improves global cognition, memory, executive function, and information processing speed. | [ |
| Patients with mild to moderate AD, DB, R, PC (n = 424 months) | ADAS-cog & CDR | Improvement in cognitive functions. | [ | |
| Extract of
| Patients with mild to moderate AD, DB, R, PC (n = 20) | CDR | Enhancement of secondary memory performance. | [ |
| Healthy individuals, SB, one factor, independent group trial (n = 135) | CDR & Bond-Lader mood scale | Significantly increases the alertness in mood and quality of memory. | [ | |
| Healthy individuals, PC, DB, balanced, crossover trail (n = 24) | CDR & Bond-Lader mood scale | Improvement on the speed of memory and secondary memory. | [ | |
| Tofu | Honolulu-Asia Aging Study (n = 3734) | All task included in Cognitive abilities screening instrument(CASI) | Higher midlife tofu consumption was independently associated with indicators of cognitive impairment and brain atrophy in late life. | [ |
| Dietary phytoestrogens | Cross-sectional study (n = 301) | Functions like, memory, processing capacity, speed and executive function | High lignan intake improves capacity, speed and executive function. | [ |
DB = Double blind; SB = Single blind; PC = Placebo controlled; R = Randomized; M = Multicentre; ADAS-Cog 11 = 11-item Alzheimer’s disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale; CASI = Cognitive abilities screening instrument; MMSE = Mini-mental state examination; CDR =Clinical dementia rating; ADL = Activities of daily living; CERAD = Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD Assessment Packet; K-CVLT = Korean version of the California Verbal Learning Test; SOPT = Self-Ordered Pointing Test; Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT); DAT = Divided Attention Task; WAIS = Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; AVLT = Auditory Verbal Learning Test; Nurnberger NAB = Alters-Beobachtungsskala; SKT = Syndrome Kurz Test; CGI = Clinical Global Impression; NAI-NAA = Nuremberg Gerontopsychological Rating Scale for Activities of Daily Living; WJCAT III = Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Abilities Test III.
Figure 2The molecular structures of asiaticoside (A), asiatic acid (B), ginsenoside Rb1(C), and ginsenoside Rg1 (D).
Figure 3The molecular structures of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (A), caryophyllen (B), camphor (C), borneol (D), and 1,8-cineol (E).
Figure 4Molecular structures of carene (A), genistein (B), daidzein (C), glycitein (D), and presenegenin (E).