M A Raskind1, E R Peskind, T Wessel, W Yuan. 1. Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98108, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Galantamine is a reversible, competitive cholinesterase inhibitor that also allosterically modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. These mechanisms of action provided the rationale for a therapeutic trial of galantaminein AD. METHODS: A 6-month, multicenter, double-blind trial was undertaken in 636 patients with mild to moderate AD. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or galantamine and escalated to maintenance doses of 24 or 32 mg/d. Eligible patients then entered a 6-month, open-label study of the 24 mg/d dose. Primary efficacy measures were the 11-item AD Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus). The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale was a secondary efficacy variable. RESULTS:Galantamine significantly improved cognitive function relative to placebo; the treatment effects were 3.9 points (lower dose) and 3.8 points (higher dose) on the ADAS-cog/11 scale at month 6 (p < 0.001 in both cases). Both doses of galantamine produced a better outcome on CIBIC-plus than placebo (p < 0.05). Therapeutic response to galantamine was not affected by APOE genotype. At 12 months, mean ADAS-cog/11 and DAD scores had not significantly changed from baseline for patients who received galantamine 24 mg/d throughout the 12 months. The most common adverse events, which were predominantly gastrointestinal, decreased in frequency during long-term treatment. There was no evidence of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS:Galantamine is effective and safe in AD. At 6 months, galantamine significantly improved cognition and global function. Moreover, cognitive and daily function were maintained for 12 months with the 24 mg/d dose.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Galantamine is a reversible, competitive cholinesterase inhibitor that also allosterically modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. These mechanisms of action provided the rationale for a therapeutic trial of galantamine in AD. METHODS: A 6-month, multicenter, double-blind trial was undertaken in 636 patients with mild to moderate AD. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or galantamine and escalated to maintenance doses of 24 or 32 mg/d. Eligible patients then entered a 6-month, open-label study of the 24 mg/d dose. Primary efficacy measures were the 11-item AD Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus). The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale was a secondary efficacy variable. RESULTS:Galantamine significantly improved cognitive function relative to placebo; the treatment effects were 3.9 points (lower dose) and 3.8 points (higher dose) on the ADAS-cog/11 scale at month 6 (p < 0.001 in both cases). Both doses of galantamine produced a better outcome on CIBIC-plus than placebo (p < 0.05). Therapeutic response to galantamine was not affected by APOE genotype. At 12 months, mean ADAS-cog/11 and DAD scores had not significantly changed from baseline for patients who received galantamine 24 mg/d throughout the 12 months. The most common adverse events, which were predominantly gastrointestinal, decreased in frequency during long-term treatment. There was no evidence of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS:Galantamine is effective and safe in AD. At 6 months, galantamine significantly improved cognition and global function. Moreover, cognitive and daily function were maintained for 12 months with the 24 mg/d dose.
Authors: Thomas J Hopkins; Laura E Rupprecht; Matthew R Hayes; Julie A Blendy; Heath D Schmidt Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Fernanda M Consolim-Colombo; Carine T Sangaleti; Fernando O Costa; Tercio L Morais; Heno F Lopes; Josiane M Motta; Maria C Irigoyen; Luiz A Bortoloto; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Yael Tobi Harris; Sanjaya K Satapathy; Peder S Olofsson; Meredith Akerman; Sangeeta S Chavan; Meggan MacKay; Douglas P Barnaby; Martin L Lesser; Jesse Roth; Kevin J Tracey; Valentin A Pavlov Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-07-20
Authors: Krista L Lanctôt; Nathan Herrmann; Kenneth K Yau; Lyla R Khan; Barbara A Liu; Maysoon M LouLou; Thomas R Einarson Journal: CMAJ Date: 2003-09-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jianghua Lu; Lezi E; Nairita Roy; Lewis Hutfles; Eva Selfridge; Eric Funk; Jeffrey M Burns; Russell H Swerdlow Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.472