Literature DB >> 22926551

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.

Masayuki Watanabe1, Yoshifumi Baba, Yohei Nagai, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer were reviewed to clarify the benefits of this surgical modality.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using synonyms for minimally invasive or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. There were 18 retrospective cohort studies and 3 meta-analyses retrieved in this review.
RESULTS: There are several minimally invasive approaches for esophageal cancer. Total MIE using both the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach is increasingly performed. A longer operative time and less blood loss are observed with MIE in comparison to open esophagectomy (OE). Although the benefit of MIE for reducing morbidity and mortality rates is still under debate, a shorter hospital stay was common among the studies. The oncologic outcomes of MIE were not inferior to OE, while the number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in MIE than OE in several studies.
CONCLUSION: Total MIE using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach can be performed safely, although the benefits for short-term outcomes are still controversial. Oncologic outcomes are favorable and MIE may have an advantage in lymph node dissection over OE. The benefits of MIE should therefore be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926551     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  48 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; Th J M V van Vroonhoven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Sundaram; Juan C Geronimo; Brittany L Willer; Masato Hoshino; Zachary Torgersen; Arpad Juhasz; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

9.  Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Authors:  Rajeev Parameswaran; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard Berrisford; Shahjehan Wajed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

2.  Functional outcome assessment of swallowing (FOAMS) scoring and videofluoroscopic evaluation of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation in radical esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Okumura; Yutaka Shimada; Toru Watanabe; Naomi Nakamichi; Takuya Nagata; Kazuhiro Tsukada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Cytokine Response in the Pleural Fluid and Blood in Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Delko; D I Watson; B Beck-Schimmer; A Immanuel; D J Hussey; U Zingg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Samina Park; Yoohwa Hwang; Hyun Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim; Chang Hyun Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.

Authors:  Misbah Khan; Anam Muzaffar; Aamir Ali Syed; Shahid Khatak; Ali Raza Khan; Muhammad Ijaz Ashraf
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-15

8.  Mediastinal Adiposity Influences the Technical Difficulty of Thoracic Procedure in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Takanori Kurogochi; Yu Imamura; Koujiro Nishida; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Feasibility of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Seong Yong Park; Seokki Lee; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  [Evidence base for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].

Authors:  F Benedix; S F Dalicho; P Stübs; D Schubert; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.