Literature DB >> 19609827

Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Rajeev Parameswaran1, Darmarajah Veeramootoo, Rakesh Krishnadas, Martin Cooper, Richard Berrisford, Shahjehan Wajed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive approach to esophagogastric cancer resection offers an attractive alternative to traditional open surgery; however, concerns regarding feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes have restricted widespread acceptance of these procedures. This study outlines our comparative experiences of both open and minimally invasive esophagectomy over a 4-year period.
METHODS: Surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between 30 consecutive patients who underwent open (Ivor Lewis) transthoracic esophagectomy (TTO) between January 2002 and December 2003 and 50 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) from January 2004 to July 2006.
RESULTS: Inpatient mortality and overall surgical morbidity were identical for each cohort (TTO versus MIO: mortality 3% versus 2%; morbidity 50% versus 48%). Pulmonary-related complications were higher in the open series (23% versus 8%; p = 0.05). The incidence of gastric-conduit-related complications was similar between the two cohorts (13% versus 18%; p = 0.52). Survival at 1 and 2 years was 86% and 58% in the TTO group and 94% and 74% in the MIO group. No significant difference in calculated cost was observed (7,017 pounds sterling versus 7,885 pounds sterling).
CONCLUSIONS: Transition from open to minimally invasive techniques of esophagogastric resection for cancer is possible without compromising patient safety or incurring excessive financial expenses, and the minimally invasive procedure results in similar or potentially better outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609827     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; M Ueno; Y Tanaka; K Fukuhara; Y Hashimoto; Y Fujiwara; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Quality of life following resection of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  H U Zieren; C A Jacobi; J Zieren; J M Müller
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; J M Weerts; C Jehaes; S Markiewicz; R Lombard
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

7.  Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management.

Authors:  S Michael Griffin; Ian H Shaw; Samuel M Dresner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; S A Wajed; D Sanders; M W M Rucklidge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Yohei Nagai; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.

Authors:  Fanyu Meng; Yin Li; Haibo Ma; Ming Yan; Ruixiang Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Mei-Qing Xu; Ming-Ran Xie; Xin-Yu Mei
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marc M Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Oncological and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study.

Authors:  Wenli Wang; Yongxin Zhou; Jing Feng; Yunqing Mei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kazuo Koyanagi; Soji Ozawa; Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Sundaram; Juan C Geronimo; Brittany L Willer; Masato Hoshino; Zachary Torgersen; Arpad Juhasz; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.